Smear Campaign Lands Man in Court

Homebuyer 'launched smear campaign' against estate agents

after being gazumped

By James Tozer

(U.K., 2010) Martin Frostick is alleged to have sent out faxes falsely claiming the estate agent had gone bust

A gazumped homeowner took drastic revenge by launching a smear campaign to try to drive the estate agency he blamed out of business, a court heard today.

Martin Frostick, 53, was so aggrieved at losing the house that he circulated bogus bankruptcy petitions falsely claiming the Ryder & Dutton chain was going bust, it was alleged.

As a result, the agency was 'deluged' with inquires from clients worried about its financial state, the court heard.

It had to issue urgent public statements dismissing the notices as a 'malicious rumour' to save its reputation from being fatally damaged, it was claimed.

Frostick allegedly walked into a branch of the agency - based in Oldham, Greater Manchester - last June demanding information about a house sale back in 1997.

The complaint related to a house he had owned which had been repossessed, and he had later been gazumped in a sale, the court was told.

Staff said they didn't keep records that far back and Frostick left, slamming the door.

The following day he sent an email to Richard Powell, one of the directors, said Roderick Priestley, prosecuting at Minshull Street Crown Court, Manchester.

'It was some sort of grievance the defendant had with the firm over a repossession of a house which Mr Frostick owned in Oldham. He seemed to have been gazumped in a sale.'

Mr Powell then received 'abusive and threatening' faxes followed by a document purporting be a petition regarding the winding up of Ryder & Dutton, the court heard.

Mr Priestley said the notice was a fictitious one drawn up by Frostick. 'It was made by the defendant to damage the company,' he added.

The firm called the police after receiving a further email from Frostick containing 31 pages of names and numbers of companies to which he allegedly planned to send the fax.
Ryder & Dutton estate agents in Royton near Oldham

In addition, Frostick allegedly circulated a copy of an article from the London Gazette - which carries insolvency notices - altered to suggest Ryder & Dutton had gone bust.

He is also accused of sending a newspaper article about the collapse of Northern Rock which had been manipulated to carry the firm's name instead.

'The firm was deluged with enquires about the financial health of the company,' Mr Priestley said.

One leasing firm actually terminating a contract as a result of the rumours.

'What this man did caused significant inconvenience, stress and time,' Mr Priestley told the jury.

'So in order to protect their reputation they issued an urgent statement where they made it very clear that this was a dishonest and malicious rumour.

'What is clear is that Mr Frostick perceives that he has been wronged and 11 years later has decided to proceed with a complaint.

'But he, in effect, says because they wouldn't respond successfully to him, he then embarked upon this campaign.'

Frostick of Delph, near Oldham, was arrested two weeks later. Told about the cancelling of the lease agreement, he allegedly retorted: 'Good, I'm delighted.'

The trial heard Frostick admits coming up with the idea but denies fraud by making false representations.



ORIGINAL ARTICLE HERE

Someone can only be DEFAMED if what you are saying about them is FALSE, NOT FULLY VERIFIABLE, ASSUMED FROM SCANT INFORMATION or UNTRUE.

If it IS TRUE - it is not: defamation, slander and/or libel. And you'd best be able to PROVE IN A COURT OF LAW that it is true. (Information that might possibly indicate something or you are assuming it indicates something is usually non-admissible.)

EOPC is held legally harmless - all claims of posted misinformation must be pursued THROUGH THE PERSON THAT SIGNED THE RELEASE TO US AND SUBMITTED IT IN THEIR COUNTRY OF ORIGIN.

Cyber-Romance Ended by Police

(AUSTRALIA) An international romance, spanning the Pacific Ocean, that started with a click of a mouse has finished with a knock at the door.

Police, following a request from an Illinois sheriff, this week went to a Rockhampton man's home to stop his cyber affair with a woman from Peoria, USA. The man indicated he'd not long discovered from a third party their online relationship was on the blink.

However, the woman had complained to her local sheriff about harassing messages.

A police spokesman said the US sheriff contacted officers at the Rockhampton station on Wednesday night with the visit made to the man's home the next morning.

“He has stated he was unaware the online relationship was over until he was notified by a third party,” the police spokesman said. “He was still liaising with the young lady in the US before that."

“She was receiving this as harassment.”

He said the man agreed to stop all contact with the woman.

CQUniversity's Dean of Information and Communication Technology professor Mark Looi said online relationships were becoming increasingly common as more people went online.

Professor Looi said he was aware of other cases where authorities had warned someone after an on-line relationship went sour. However, he said he'd not heard of anyone being charged in these types of circumstances.

Any offence on the internet that originated out of Queensland was dealt with under the Queensland legislation.

Harassment complaints are generally covered under the Telecommunications Act, which has a provision that the internet not be used for this purpose.

Professor Looi said anyone who felt they were being harassed online should contact the service provider if the abuse was of a lower level. He said if they felt worried they should inform police.


original article can be found here

Even If People Don't Like It - Freedom of Speech is Protected

(NEW MEXICO, U.S.A.) — A New Mexico man's decision to lash out with a billboard ad saying his ex-girlfriend had an abortion against his wishes has touched off a legal debate over free speech and privacy rights.

The sign on Alamogordo's main thoroughfare shows 35-year-old Greg Fultz holding the outline of an infant. The text reads, "This Would Have Been A Picture Of My 2-Month Old Baby If The Mother Had Decided To Not KILL Our Child!"

Fultz's ex-girlfriend has taken him to court for harassment and violation of privacy. A domestic court official has recommended the billboard be removed.

But Fultz's attorney argues the order violates his client's free speech rights.

"As distasteful and offensive as the sign may be to some, for over 200 years in this country the First Amendment protects distasteful and offensive speech," Todd Holmes said.

The woman's friends say she had a miscarriage, not an abortion, according to a report in the Albuquerque Journal.

Holmes disputes that, saying his case is based on the accuracy of his client's statement.
"My argument is: What Fultz said is the truth," Holmes said.

The woman's lawyer said she had not discussed the pregnancy with her client. But for Ellen Jessen, whether her client had a miscarriage or an abortion is not the point. The central issue is her client's privacy and the fact that the billboard has caused severe emotional distress, Jessen said.

"Her private life is not a matter of public interest," she told the Alamogordo Daily News. Jessen says her client's ex-boyfriend has crossed the line.

For his part, Holmes invoked the U.S. Supreme Court decision from earlier this year concerning the Westboro Baptist Church, which is known for its anti-gay protests at military funerals and other high-profile events. He believes the high court's decision to allow the protests, as hurtful as they are, is grounds for his client to put up the abortion billboard.

"Very unpopular offensive speech," he told the Alamogordo Daily News. "The Supreme Court, in an 8 to 1 decision, said that is protected speech."

Holmes says he is going to fight the order to remove the billboard through a District Court appeal.

original article here

(hat tip: Mary M.)

Cyberstalking on the Rise

by MICKI STEELE

When John Carlin began receiving photos on his cell phone last year of his live-in companion with other people, he didn’t realize he was being cyber-stalked.

Carlin says he turned to police after finding an online ad with his photo that encouraged men to come to his home for sex, but got no help stopping the harassment.

He said police didn’t want to look at the ad or other evidence he had collected, including alarming text and e-mail messages Carlin said were from a man he met in a bar.

“Crazy people don’t quit,” said Carlin, 38, of Dearborn. “I’m the one that’s going to go to jail trying to protect myself, especially when the cops do nothing.”

Metro Detroit authorities say they’re getting more complaints of online stalking, as social networking sites and cell phones make it easier to connect with people — and harass them.

The Wayne County Sheriff’s Office reports receiving eight times more cyber-stalking complaints than two years ago.

In Dearborn, police saw cyber-stalking complaints rise from 12 in 2008 to 21 in 2009. The department has nine cases this year; Lt. Mark Tobias said he expects an uptick with schools open again.

“Cyber crime or anything else, our protocol is we will respond,” Dearborn Lt. Neil Myres said.

Recent high-profile cases such as the suicide of a Rutgers University student, whose intimate encounter with another man was broadcast online, have led advocates to push back against abusive cyber behavior.

The issue is attracting attention in Lansing, Michigan. State Rep. Lisa Brown, D-West Bloomfield, proposed legislation last week to crack down on cyber crimes against children and teens.

“We need to keep up with the new threats to our children,” she said. “It’s not acceptable to intimidate, harass or embarrass anyone using technology.”

Nationally, the number of people stalked is estimated at 3.4 million, according to a survey based on the 2006 Supplemental Victimization Survey of stalking behaviors, released in 2009 by the U.S. Department of Justice. One in four — or about 850,000 — were victims of cyber stalking.

In 75 percent of the surveyed cases, the stalker was a former lover, friend, neighbor or roommate whose actions caused victims to fear for their safety.

The relative anonymity of the Internet and the explosion of social networking sites have spurred a new breed of online criminal who uses personal information as a weapon, said Deputy Erin Diamond, an electronic forensics expert in the Internet Crimes Unit of the Wayne County Sheriff’s Department.

Diamond said he gets at least two calls a week from police for help with cyber-stalking cases, up from one such call per month two years ago.

“You’re giving clues to where you’re hanging out, and that’s gold to stalkers,” Diamond said.

Diamond said local police departments “don’t exactly know how to handle the digital evidence” because it’s a newer crime and training isn’t widely available. And limited manpower forces investigators to choose between more tangible crimes, like homicide, over virtual ones.

Stalking is illegal in all 50 states, but laws vary. One expert thinks stalking is more likely to be prosecuted as a federal crime.

Nina Ginsberg, a criminal defense attorney in Virginia, said cyber stalking can become a felony when someone accesses another person’s stored electronic information and uses it to steal an identity, review bank records or make harassing phone calls.

“Getting into an e-mail account or Facebook account, snooping on them using the Internet or the telephone — that’s what cyber stalking is,” she said.

Jasmine O’Connor, a West Bloomfield computer repair technician, said more than two years after she divorced her second husband, she’s still being stalked and harassed.

When she learned her husband was seeing the mother of his child, she told him she wanted to end their six-week marriage and kicked him out of the house.

When he repeatedly called her at work, she almost lost her job. And when he could no longer reach her by phone, he sent her profane e-mails, she said.

The harassment has slowed, but “I just want it to go away,” she said.

Laura Gipson, 30, an administrative assistant at a Detroit hospital, said she couldn’t get a judge to take her seriously when a neighbor’s jealous girlfriend posted nasty Facebook updates about her and sent multiple friend requests daily for months.

Gipson blocked the girlfriend’s Facebook advances. Then, the woman confronted her at a party in late June. The two women fought in her neighbor’s apartment and Gipson was arrested. A court case is pending.

When Gipson sought a personal protection order after seeing the woman in July in her building, a judge refused her request, citing mutual harassment.

“To her, it was a ‘so what?’ kind of thing,” Gipson said. “People of an older generation don’t take things like that seriously.”

But the judge’s opinion in the Gipson case may be atypical.

“At some level, we shouldn’t be surprised that as tech develops that the stalker reflects society,” said Kevin Burke, vice president of the Williamsburg, Va.-based American Judges Association and a district judge in Minnesota. “It’s just one more tool for people whose aberrant behavior is to destroy somebody else.”

Additional Facts
If you're stalked - What to do

• Document stalking behavior.


• Print screen shots of unwanted electronic messages or pictures.


• Save text and voice messages.


• Contact an advocacy organization for help with stalking documentation and to develop a safety plan.


• Report the crime to your local police. (do not leave the station until you have moved up the chain of command and gotten a copy of the written report)
  

Safety Net Project of the National Network to End Domestic Violence http://www.nnedv.org/projects/safetynet
Working to Halt Online Abuse http://www.haltabuse.org
National Center for Victims of Crime http://www.ncvc.org

Proving a Stalkers Guilt Causes Distress for Victims

The impunity with which a Brooklyn man stalks a neighbor exposes legal ambiguities that force victims to prove harassment before cops will act, an expert said Sunday.

"In stalking cases, the experience has been that victims suffer a great amount of frustration," said security consultant Sal Lifrieri."It becomes more dependent upon the victim to put the case together themselves and then bring it to the authorities."

That difficulty has been at the heart of a four-year-long campaign of harassment suffered by a Daily News freelance photographer at the hands of an elderly neighbor.

She says Allen Novell, 73, has followed her around the city for years, but since he has never directly threatened or communicated with her, authorities can't bring charges.

Novell - who has a history of assault - has denied stalking the photographer.

"Finding that line where you really cross over to criminal territory is kind of arbitrary," Lifrieri said. "If he is not approaching you, and not doing anything or causing any harm, it's much harder to prove."

In recent high-profile celebrity stalking cases involving Madonna, Uma Thurman and Ivanka Trump, the stalkers made threatening phone calls or posted creepy Internet messages.

In a case where there is no overt harassment, it is key to document the pattern of contact in as much detail as possible so there is clear evidence to give to police.

"You need to document all those times that it occurs. It'll show a history of the occurrences in very specific detail," Lifrieri said.

He also suggested that victims look carefully at their online profiles to make sure they aren't revealing too much about themselves or their whereabouts for a potential stalker to see.

original article here

U.K. Threatens to Post Intimate Photos of His Ex Online

A MAN from rural north Northumberland threatened to post intimate pictures of his teenage ex-girlfriend online after their relationship broke down.

The man, who cannot be named for legal reasons, appeared in court in Berwick last week charged with harassing his ex-girlfriend’s father and grandmother.

The court heard he also called her a ‘dog’ and alleged she was promiscuous in texts to the 17 year-old’s father and grandmother.

Magistrates heard that the 26-year-old, who pleaded guilty, had sent the texts and made phone calls to his ex-girlfriend’s family after their two-year relationship broke down and she started seeing another man.

James Long, prosecuting, said the girl’s family had never approved of the relationship and when it ended he said the defendant sent a text message to her father which said ‘your daughter is a dog’.

This was then repeated in other texts the defendant sent to her father over a period of a few days in January.

Mr Long said that the girl’s grandmother also received phone calls and text messages from the defendant, which he said were ‘abusive and threatening’.

He said the defendant then started to threaten the girl’s grandmother that if they contacted the police he would post pictures of his ex-girlfriend on the internet.

Mr Long said that the grandmother believed from the threats that these pictures were of a ‘sexual nature’.

In other messages to the girl’s grandmother, the defendant called the teen a ‘dirty little slag’ and alleged she slept around.

Mr Long added that on receiving the first text the grandmother had replied that she was going to contact the police, while the girl’s father had not responded to any of them.

Ian O’Rourke, defending, said that his client and the 17-year-old had since got back together and were planning to move away in an attempt to re-build their relationship.

He said: “The defendant and X are now back together and their take on this is that it is just her family ganging up on him. It’s probable that the truth is somewhere in the middle.
The context of this case is that X and the defendant had a relationship of in excess of two years. This started when she was 15 and at one stage she was pregnant and last year had a termination."

“It is fair to say that her family did not approve of the defendant – they did not get on at all.
“They split up as there was another man involved and then text messages and telephone calls started going between the defendant and X, essentially being childish and abusive to each other. The defendant then involved her father in this and it is fair to say on his behalf that there are not that many messages to her dad.”

Mr O’Rourke added: “He accepts by his plea that it was quite wrong of him to send the texts to X’s father and grandmother at all. They were not appropriate at all and were conducive to harassment.

“The threats about putting photos on Facebook was a two-way thing, as X had intimate photos of him and threatened to put them on Facebook. It does seem rather childish,” he said.

The case was adjourned for three weeks for reports.


original article here

Neighbour Admits Nine-Month CyberHarassment Campaign

by Daryl Slade

(ALBERTA, CANADA) Annoyed at his neighbours calling city bylaw enforcement about him and another neighbour, Michael Kenzie MacLeod embarked on a nine-month spree of ruthlessly harassing them through the Internet.

MacLeod, 35, who said he was formerly friends with Robert and Kathy Smith, set up e-mail accounts in their name that resulted in fictitious ads being placed on a local Internet website to sell merchandise.

As a result of personal ads, which contained her name and address, Kathy Smith received hundreds of phone calls from people wishing to buy items and obscene calls and visits to their door from men who believed they had corresponded with her about having sexual encounters.

MacLeod pleaded guilty Thursday to criminal harassment.

Crown prosecutor Nadine Nesbitt, who argued for a conditional jail sentence of 18 months with house arrest, said in reading an agreed statement of facts in court Thursday that MacLeod posed in the e-mails as being Kathy Smith.

Smith said in her victim impact statement that MacLeod’s actions were “relentless psychological torture” that caused her family to fear for her life.

“I could have been killed by a stranger sent to our door,” she said, choking back tears. Due to the proximity of the offender, I was deprived of peace in my own home. My family and I were selected targets.

“I felt like I was imprisoned in my own home. I was face to face with an unidentified man . . . today, I saw my attacker for the first time and, even though it’s been over for a year, I still live in fear.”

Nesbitt said the offender’s actions were often very disturbing in nature.

“On Sept. 6, 2008, Kathy Smith received a phone call from an unknown male that was very sexually graphic,” she told provincial court Judge Anne Brown. “The male told Kathy Smith in very vulgar terms what he would like to do with her sexually. The male called (her) several times and told her he was responding to her personal ad on usedcalgary.com and he was the person still communicating with her using her e-mail address.”

That man was eventually traced through a pay phone and video surveillance and, although not charged by police, was fired from his job.

Also, Kathy Smith received an “e-mail bomb” from MacLeod, which included 250 similar e-mails over a couple of hours on Jan. 17, 2009, virtually crippling her system.

It purported to be from the Canadian Mental Health Association and was entitled, “CMHA are watching you.”

The offender also used another neighbour’s unsecured wireless router to send many of the e-mails, resulting in police tracing them to the neighbours’ home, seizing their computers and taking them in for questioning.

MacLeod also posted many of the fictitious ads using his laptop computer while visiting China and Orlando, Fla.

Nesbitt said part of his sentence should include a condition that he take counselling for anger management. Defence lawyer Jim Lutz sought a similar conditional sentence, albeit 12 months long.

He noted his client believed he just set up the calls or meetings through the ads and did not have control over what happened afterward.

That prompted Brown to quip, “It’s a bit like loading a weapon and giving it to someone.”

Robert Smith said in his victim impact statement that he and his family have been devastated by the crimes that still affect them because, despite efforts by police to remove any reference to the ads, they still can be called up and have their home address on them.

They have had to change phone numbers and e-mail addresses they have used for 20 years.

“We have been and still are paralyzed from this crime. I wake up at night thinking about these crimes,” Smith said in his statement. “We don’t know who has our phone number or address and will show up at our door.

“For four months in 2008, Kathy was harassed with phone calls, some saying they were coming to our house. The callers also seemed to know when I was leaving. One caller said I just left and said he and a friend were coming to our house later that day.”

MacLeod apologized to the Smiths for his actions before the judge adjourned sentencing.

“I wasn’t fully aware of all the impact it had on you, until I heard your statements today,” he said. “I’m sorry for that.”

Brown will sentence him on June 3.






original article here

Some Thoughts About the Dangers of the Internet

Some excerpts from a blog by a student at Virginia Tech. Insightful and thoughtful. Our comments are in dark blue:


On How the Internet Scares Me So Much I Might Never Want To Use It Ever Again

Do you feel empowered by the internet?
Discuss in relation to the recent federal election in USA.

If you have yet to read my paper on social networking site, Facebook, and the dangers associating yourself with it then that ought to answer the question, along with the title of this blog entry. I felt so naive researching for my paper. How could I have thought that just because my "privacy settings" were up, that I would be protected from people? I even was unaware that my own profile was allowing data to be accessed without my permission.

Two years ago, I was being stalked on and offline by a boy I'd met through a mutual friend. We went out a few times and it didn't work out. He harassed me, he called me all the time, left messages on AIM and my phone. Even when I said I didn't want anything to do with him, he'd go away a couple days then come back to tell me that if I didn't want to "be" with him, he would make me very sorry. Mentioning shootings on campus (before April 16, 2007) such as "standing on the drill field and picking people off" and cause harm to me and those I loved. My roommates, friends and my dog who hated him (for good reason; I've never seen my puppy bite someone before him). I felt stuck. I was trapped, as long as I made a little contact. Even if it was "I hate you, leave me alone" bi-weekly, he would make less threats.

How do you reject someone who creeps you out so bad? I was scared to sleep at night, I was scared to I avoided dining halls, I was fearful leaving my puppy at home thinking I might come back to some murder scene. I felt insane thinking that this one person might do something on-campus. Things like that just didn't happen. Right?

I went to the Women's Center to ask them what I might do and they helped me file a cyberstalking and stalking report. I felt ashamed to be putting this horrible label to someone who I thought was clearly ill.

When it was brought up to the school in November of 2006, the school dismissed it saying he was "not responsible". They felt even with hard copies of evidence provided with text messages, emails and instant messages; that cyberstalking wasn't likely.

I had already filed a report with Virginia Tech police, and thus Blacksburg Police, so the trial was set for April 2007. A week after April 16th. (GOOD FOR HER! Don't let police blow you off!)

He was found guilty. Only after a real live case blew up to something no one imagined could spawn from cyberstalking and a mentally ill derangement about our own campus, did this sort of crime seem "real" in Southwest Virginia. I am still waiting for a 2009 hearing to see if he will go to jail or not.

Cyberstalking is real.

Facebook, myspace, blogger are giving away your personal information. Your credit cards, if you used [them]. Your addresses you put on your profile, your phone numbers, your dog's name, your favorite ice cream flavor. Your face.

I got off track, but I wanted to show how it starts online. I feel frustrated and worried in this way.

I also feel that being online is wonderful in other ways though.The Internet is a wonderful form of media, it is also not in the same way. There are millions of users, millions and billions of writings, more facts and figures that you could think about and anything you want to learn about, you can find online. It's great to have that sort of power at your fingertips. Things that I never would have known about, I can learn online.

[snipped]

I guess like anything, you have people who abuse the power and people who embrace it in a good way.

We all can cause harm to others using the Internet, there are ways to inject evil towards others with a short little Google search we could steal identities, stalk and threat, invade privacy and treat people like dirt.

It comes down to ethics and morals; if you're gonna believe everything you read or see or hear.

Beware "Guardian" and Her Proxy Recruitment

If you read this site, are a victim of abuse, have ever visited an abuse site, advocate for abuse victims or cyberpath victims - beware: GUARDIAN IS ON THE CASE!!!

An troll named Betsy Ashby - nicknamed Guardian has been in touch with Gary Stone, our 2 1/2 year harasser and 4 year harasser of his victims, who was just reprofiled, to let him know who they believe EOPC is and with "proof" of who we are! lol...

fromGary Stone backbeatone@gmail.com
dateFri, May 20, 2011 at 2:12

Sandra Brown has never communicated with me. Guardian has, and I have her name, her phone.Guardian, has sent me pdf
files, citing law suits against XXX,and in one of the pdf, it is clear, XXX's
hard drive, is under subpoena.I am not obliged to reveal this information, but
the case is filed in MO. I have had numerous visits to my varieuswars with you
from Mo as well. I have guardian's full information.And, she says to me, that
Sandra Brown MA, from northCarolina, does not endorse you. I have guardian's phone,and her website. And her name. The emphasis in the phonecall was placed, on sandra brown's dissassociation from yourblog. The caller named XXX, as one of two corrent writers XXX being the other. Lisa Scott, is also a "suspect"fighter, per Betsy, the first name of guardian. The blog she referred me to was writtern primarily by XXX and XXX,"the foul mouth one" is XXX

Gary Stone
......................

fromGary Stone backbeatone@gmail.com
dateFri, May 20, 2011 at 3:39 PM
hide details May 20 (2 days ago)

I wont be forewarding the email to the source. Stop playing gane

www.toylanderstpi.com
http://hubpages.com/profile/The+Toylanders
http://www.ilike.com/artist/The+Toylanders

Guardian is going to feed Stone and her minions on Cassiopaea.org the names of people she doesn't like to cyberpaths in her proxy recruitment of harassers. And she's going to dig up 'evidence' even if its 20 years old or invalid or fabricated, keep screaming loud & long hoping that will give it the air of 'truth' and force it to fit! LOL

.......................

Don't confuse Stone with reality, readers - Guardian has told him everything he needs to know. LOL

Guardian aka Betsy Ashby appears to be a woman from North Carolina (our ruse got her to rant and in her making fun of us - give us further information) who has been trolling the net for years and has been banned from or kicked off of numerous abuse support sites, native american, new age and pagan sites in the past.

She decided to bestow her bounty of erroneous, assumed secret 'facts' on Stone as her proxy to harass and hassle people who have called her on what she does to other victims in the past. She purposely fed Stone the names of people she (and her BFF Sandra Brown, MA) wants harassed; one of them just happens to be an old victim of a cyberpath who Stone keeps poking at; and she strung together her research to make it seem plausible; Making it seem she's "figured it all out" and is just helping poor Stone!

"When caught in a lie or challenged with the truth, they are seldom perplexed or embarrassed--they simply change their stories or attempt to rework the facts so that they appear to be consistent with the lie." (Dr. Robert Hare, Author WITHOUT CONSCIENCE)

Stone believes because Ashby gave him her phone number and "name" she must actually know something! He doesn't realize he's being used and this whole thing will only torpedo whatever chance at a 'case' he may still have had. She strung together a bunch of unrelated facts, sprinkled in some lies, assumptions and misstatements and presented it as a cohesive whole. Sound familiar, readers?

She's not 'helping' anyone - she's simply starting one of her many smear campaigns, which she has done in the past. With too much time on her hands, she's online causing trouble. She seems to be fixated on a handful of people. She's not exposing anyone who's abusing the internet and others - she's decided to ASSIST poor poor cyberpaths, harassers & predators who DESERVED to be exposed! Perhaps this handful of people she attacks have caught her or her friends doing things they shouldn't have been?

http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,8379.0.html

http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,23677.0.html

---------------------------------

FROM: http://newagefraud.org/smf/index.php?topic=1234.0

Ashby issued dozens of threats of lawsuits, none of which were ever carried out. In fact, her lawyer's tactics were so sleazy and unethical, he faced being disbarred and only avoided any action from his state bar by concealing his address.



And as already pointed out , when she [Ashby] doesn't like someone she appears very willing to ignore obvious information that casts her so called documentation into doubt.

Betsy Ashby has a talent for selecting the facts that support the point she wants to make, inventing a few things that aren't fact at all, and leaving out everything that doesn't support the story she wants people to believe .

Yes, Ashby's campaigns have been a spectacular and downright laughable failure.

Since we started in 2005, the ONLY ones interested in who we are - are ALWAYS THOSE WE EXPOSE!!!

Guardian thinks that if abuse victims know each other, if bloggers know each other - then LOGICALLY they are all in cahoots against innocent people like GARY STONE!!! ROFL!

Guardian said our anonymity = weak yet we don't see her advertising who she is. We see her shrieking about anyone who is digging up information about her yet she feels totally justified to post people's addresses, phone numbers, employers, children - online. All things we never do because it can and does harm innocent people and is actionable as a part of IDENTITY THEFT!

No, we see her trouble-making and feeling all powerful behind a keyboard. Sounds a bit like a cyberpath. Who we are is immaterial to anyone but a cyberpath, predator or harasser that we catch.Those innocent people Guardian is trying very very hard to TIE TOGETHER; none of whom are us and most of whom we DID NOT EVEN KNOW UNTIL NOW... have been kind enough to show us their evidence of GUARDIAN's malicious stalking!! (more coming and when it does we will post it):

Here's just ONE our statistics on Guardian's many visits here:

Entry Page Time: 20 May 2011 07:53:47 PM
Visit Length: 32 mins 7 secs
Browser: Firefox 3.5
OS: WinVista
Resolution: 1280x800
Location: United States
IP Address: Frontier Communications (50.55.222.199)
Referring URL: http://www.google.com/ gary stone
Entry Page: http://cyberpaths.blogspot.com/
Exit Page: http://cyberpaths.blogspot.com/


Here's the statistics from another blog:

Number of Visits: 145

Entry Page Time: 20 May 2011 06:52:27 PM
Visit Length: 2 hours 53 mins 3 secs
Browser: Firefox 3.5
OS: WinVista
Resolution: 1280x800

Location: United States
IP Address: Frontier Communications (50.55.222.199)
16 May 04:48:56 PM
file:///C:/Users/Public/Downloads/PredatorArchive/ahc/st-melissa-kester-livin-in-victimhood.html
(No referring link) 16 May 04:51:23 PM
file:///C:/Users/Public/Downloads/PredatorArchive/ahc/melissa-kester-preyed-upon-and-bilked.html
(No referring link) 16 May 04:54:54 PM
file:///C:/Users/Public/Downloads/PredatorArchive/ahc/my-dead-psychopath-my-film.html
(No referring link) 16 May 05:01:35 PM
file:///C:/Users/Public/Downloads/PredatorArchive/ahc/anyone-else-see-uncanny-resemblance.html
(No referring link) 16 May 05:05:05 PM
file:///C:/Users/Public/Downloads/PredatorArchive/ahc/payday.html
(No referring link) 19 May 02:34:50 PM
file:///C:/Users/Public/Downloads/PredatorArchive/ahc/anyone-else-see-uncanny-resemblance.html
(No referring link) 19 May 02:36:49 PM
file:///C:/Users/Public/Downloads/PredatorArchive/ahc/her-pathological-games.html
(No referring link) 19 May 02:45:42 PM
file:///C:/Users/Guardian/Documents/_MaryM/ahc/screenwriter-melissa-kester-what-joke.html
(No referring link) 19 May 02:52:14 PM
file:///C:/Users/Guardian/Documents/_MaryM/ahc/waxed-skankfish-im-sure-kester-gets.html

__________________

Guardian has a lot on her hard drive, doesn't she? She's the judge & jury with her "PREDATOR ARCHIVE"!

___________________

Guardian has a specific agenda against certain people and she's trying to play them against one another. Guardian must have way too much time on her hands!

(you do know Guardian - DOWNLOADING THESE THINGS FROM PEOPLE'S BLOGS IS A COPYRIGHT VIOLATION UNDER FEDERAL LAW??? oh wait, Guardian "knows" the law because Guardian "is" the law - on her planet.)

Guardian says she's got SCREENSHOTS of people's COMPUTERS!! That's an admission of hacking... too late Guardian - we took a screenshot of that post on Cassiopea and passed it along to those you're accusing so they can take it to Frontier Communications and law enforcment as EVIDENCE OF HACKING... another Federal offense. BTW - our screen shot? Was on an open, public forum... not someone's private computer.

On top of that, we have made no secret that XXX has allowed us to use her miniserver since 2005 as thanks for outing her cyberpath. We have proxy servers that we can just plug server numbers into - so it looks like we could be any one of the millions of people using the same server and IP as XXX. XXX is a DV advocate who has helped many many other advocates such as us: Sandra Brown, MA; Dr. Robert Hare and so on. Are you merely a psychopath trying to attack those of us who fight to educate people about someone like you? Nice try, Guardian!

And why your very unnatural and perverted interest? or in cyberstalking XXX and XXX? aside from helping poor, poor Gary Stone?? what's YOUR agenda Guardian? Linking Lissa Daly (from Australia or New Zealand) to the targets of your stalking and rage? Who cares about lawsuits, web postings or comments by others who may be some of the victims we support?? or someone we don't even know?? You seem to have a lot of time to stalk and harass people, Guardian - or give innocent names to people like Stone to get them to participate in your game playing? Who cares? We care about the victims we support & validate.

What is clear is that you seem more interested in hurting as many unrelated, blameless people as you can with your ridiculous assumptions.

And feeding these people to someone like Stone as 'proof' of something you have 'uncovered'? -- you're an idiot Guardian.

BEWARE FELLOW BLOGGERS: Frontier Communications on your statistics? in your hits? It's GUARDIAN ON THE CASE!

for JUST some of the incoherent ravings of Gary Stone that he got from his new BFF "Guardian" CLICK HERE

Betsy/ Guardian keeps feeding Stone's persecution complex then sitting back to enjoy the show. (much like bully & liar Scott Powers did!!)

Here's just some of Guardian's venom against EOPC and innocent people they want Stone and others to think are us, using cult leader Laura Knight Jadcyzk's Cassiopaea forum to do it (read the last 5 or 6 posts)
http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=8379.msg258751#new

Guardian - you're cyberstalking people and passing along twisted "facts" to known crazies in order to make trouble -- and we're on to you. You thought you could destroy this blog and harm innocent people at the same time. Once we find out everything about you - you'll be exposed too.

Seems you do this harassing - accusing - stalking A LOT Guardian, er Betsy, er Bettie, er Nancy:

http://64.38.12.138/boardx/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=35406

http://mail.indianz.com/boardx/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=36235&whichpage=4

https://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.asatru/browse_thread/thread/50f9dcda79475d49

http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=20972122 SEXUAL ABUSE OF A YOUNG GIRL?!

http://www.newagefraud.org/smf/index.php?action=printpage;topic=2312.0ttp://www.nntpnews.info/threads/9930250-Betsy-Ashby-Guardian-is-a-Hypocrite has this gem:

Betsy Guardain claims to defend people from predators but defends the
predators she likes. .. I see a false Guardian. A Guardian who thinks shes the exception to her own rules. I call that hypocracy. I call that deceptive and corrupt.

http://mail.indianz.com/boardx/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=36235&whichpage=4 You do this a lot don't you Guardian? Don't you have a real job?

Does Sandra Brown, MA know what her volunteer office assistant is up to? That's she's allowing a serial harasser to have full access to her emails, client list, people's personal information? That you probably send out emails AS Ms. Brown, Betsy? Did Brown even bother to check you out?

It is also deeply troubling that Laura Knight Jadzyck is aiding in your smear and disinformation campaign.

Don't you remember the old saying that 'when you throw mud at others your own hands get dirty.' No? how about the one about throwing stones when you live in a GLASS HOUSE?

CHECK MATE, Guardian

_____________________

Sandra Brown, MA's volunteer office assistant, advocate and helper is GUARDIAN. When you get email from Brown - it may not be from her but from BETSY ASHBY! You may be pouring your heart out to a serial harasser.:

Bettie (Betsy). Ashby

Out of the Dark, Inc..

76XX Whispering Pines Trail

Windsor, VA 23487

(757) XXX-0664

----------------

Anyone with more information about Ashby/ Guardian's online activities - please contact us. (we are not interested in her family, address or phone number or their jobs, just her online 'busy' work)

Stone's Threats, Provocations and Mood Swings

(POSSIBLE TRIGGER WARNING TO ABUSE VICTIMS; STRONG LANGUAGE WARNING ALSO)

What is disturbing about these messages is the extreme-range swings in mood from Stone. His disregard for Victim 1 & 2's minor child; his assumption that Victim 1 wants to speak to him (she didn't); his threats and attempted provocations.

For victims who may already have trauma issues, such as PTSD or even illness - these threats can provoke extreme fear. While some may find these messages from Stone harmless - we can never know when someone this unpredictable may snap..

In 5+ years, Stone simply will not stop. Everything usual has been tried. EOPC even took down his expose by request of his victims for over 2 years; still the emails and accusations continue unabated. Legal remedies against these are currently being further explored:

Delivered-To: stonybox@gmail.com
Received: by 10.64.242.13 with SMTP id p13cs420983qbh;
Mon, 21 Apr 2008 06:00:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.151.6.16 with SMTP id j16mr6842443ybi.213.1208782855754;
Mon, 21 Apr 2008 06:00:55 -0700 (PDT)

Return-Path:
Received: from QMTA10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net
(qmta10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.17])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 62si7754081wri.30.2008.04.21.06.00.54;
Mon, 21 Apr 2008 06:00:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of backbeatone@comcast.net designates
76.96.30.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=76.96.30.17;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of
backbeatone@comcast.net designates 76.96.30.17 as permitted sender)
smtp.mail=backbeatone@comcast.net
Received: from OMTA13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.52])
by QMTA10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast
id GAeS1Z00317UAYkAA0GM00; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:00:08 +0000
Received: from GARY ([24.147.56.158])
by OMTA13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast
id GD0a1Z0013QpPGg8Z00000; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:00:51 +0000
X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=rITDv7nW5hcA:10 a=qX23_jeXr9QKfTubGy8A:9
a=1_THaeZgReqIjVC3Cr5478f2CPMA:4 a=M15ajoi-1mQA:10 a=RPEWlWjmHvBrYwuazmoA:9
a=fRoY0Z9-3uGuaP9gzwQA:7 a=ZC1k3cNbuOJNgrqZwvYAnChBnp8A:4 a=AfD3MYMu9mQA:10
a=ep27abeu6QIyZj3T4wsA:9 a=SlEUxUnRHq0bKptqJ5pIHpoBDEQA:4 a=1Vq_FK4TplAA:10
a=CxA2Utj4LuEA:10 a=8cjj7p-wvfYw1SkCzqQA:9 a=GHq9ccWGwT5QU65o:18
a=PslmfTQ_jD8JqWeu:18 a=Pb2SVzHt4CljGM5T:18 a=R4LhTN6DCaoNIwdWUxUA:9
a=wKbvbaRfYCKVaIy8MQ_Z8aDeJGUA:4 a=KQqxNPgzF0kA:10 a=bC4pTEGzVWIA:10
a=UgPg92xnMUx7xZnr:18
Message-ID: <007701c8a3af$ac2eed60$6501a8c0@GARY>
Reply-To: "Gary Stone"
From: "Gary Stone"
To: "Victim 1"
Subject: brat
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 09:00:26 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/related;
type="multipart/alternative";
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0073_01C8A38E.241AF890"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
fromGary Stone
reply-toGary Stone

date21 April 2008 13:00
subjectbrat
mailed-bycomcast.net

hide details 21/04/2008 Reply


Fuck [Victim 1 & 2's minor child]! tell Victim 2 I said that. She's a brat. he knows where I live.

---------------------------------

Delivered-To: stonybox@gmail.com
Received: by 10.151.51.5 with SMTP id d5cs54446ybk;
Tue, 20 May 2008 12:03:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.202.15 with SMTP id z15mr9253731waf.72.1211310237545;
Tue, 20 May 2008 12:03:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.123.16 with HTTP; Tue, 20 May 2008 12:03:57 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID:
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 15:03:57 -0400
From: "Gary Stone"
To: Victim 1 and Victim 2
Subject: heres a twist
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_3100_18262370.1211310237539"

------=_Part_3100_18262370.1211310237539
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Exploit yer selves change authorship book haha abd sell it yourselves. Er...boob, how r ya? You got Victim 1 in a shit load of trouble with yer changed ways. When i am done with you old chap, they wont let you on the front porch. I hope you don't have designs on that house, i am writing XXXX, and ask her to check my facts son. I will ask her that she should will, under XXXX supervision, that Victim 1 can only live there if you are not involved, she can include me too for all I care. You see son, you don't endanger the people you live with, and, you don't hope to dance on their graves, its a common courtesy. It;s u I want babe. Now you did threaten me, and I am waiting, here i am. No weapons, just natural. fair. u game? boy?

I don't appreciate you sending that to my daughter, and so i have a bone to pick with you, I will let you have first punch it'll be yer last one. You got a little to cute with me, and I am asking u if you want to dance/ Im here. I wll sign all rights away, you can publish under XXX. XXXX, what do you say> er boob, bob. Victim 2 the acct is mine now, XXXX has another, Victim 1 you gave Victim 2 my daughters email, did Victim 1 make you do it?.Maybe you can hide in Ireland. .Could the irish tolerate the smell? right here youngster,
haha.

--------------------------------------

Delivered-To: Victim 1
Received: by 10.150.216.5 with SMTP id o5cs407477ybg;
Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:54:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.146.1 with SMTP id t1mr4688133wad.76.1213480497297;
Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:54:57 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path:
Received: from QMTA02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.24])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l37si5447022waf.23.2008.06.14.14.54.56;
Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:54:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of backbeatone@comcast.net designates 76.96.30.24 as permitted sender) client-ip=76.96.30.24;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of backbeatone@comcast.net designates 76.96.30.24 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=backbeatone@comcast.net
Received: from OMTA03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.27])
by QMTA02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast
id dvHg1Z0010b6N64A20AF00; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 21:54:56 +0000
Received: from GARY ([24.91.151.21])
by OMTA03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast
id dxuX1Z0050Tx2SY8Pxuv9g; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 21:54:56 +0000
X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=rITDv7nW5hcA:10 a=ZRrvm2JOuL3XyFbeQrYA:9
a=6Eewo1wQTbNoV_alu6BvqCxcir4A:4 a=M15ajoi-1mQA:10 a=RPEWlWjmHvBrYwuazmoA:9
a=aW8Gg4kQ2Bnt7HtbtTAA:7 a=-UReDNFxjMEGJCZaIew2QpVilIMA:4 a=AfD3MYMu9mQA:10
a=ep27abeu6QIyZj3T4wsA:9 a=SlEUxUnRHq0bKptqJ5pIHpoBDEQA:4 a=CxA2Utj4LuEA:10
a=1Vq_FK4TplAA:10 a=8cjj7p-wvfYw1SkCzqQA:9 a=GHq9ccWGwT5QU65o:18
a=PslmfTQ_jD8JqWeu:18 a=Pb2SVzHt4CljGM5T:18 a=R4LhTN6DCaoNIwdWUxUA:9
a=wKbvbaRfYCKVaIy8MQ_Z8aDeJGUA:4 a=bC4pTEGzVWIA:10 a=KQqxNPgzF0kA:10
a=UgPg92xnMUx7xZnr:18
Message-ID: <002101c8ce69$2e905d00$6501a8c0@GARY>
Reply-To: "Gary Stone"
From: "Gary Stone"
To: Victim 1
Subject: reasons
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 17:54:08 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/related;
type="multipart/alternative";
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001D_01C8CE47.A5061BE0"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
date14 June 2008 21:54
subjectreasons
mailed-bycomcast.net

hide details 14/06/2008 Reply

You are a pig and a slut. You are amoung the lowest pieces of shit, I have ever encountered. I was re-reading the reasons for the report, and I take back my apology for calling you a cunt. You are a cunt, and worse. I shouln't be apologizing to you for anything, you pathetic skank. Street walker have more ethics than you do...

----------------------------

Delivered-To: Victim 1
Received: by 10.150.216.5 with SMTP id o5cs49910ybg;
Wed, 9 Jul 2008 12:33:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.195.19 with SMTP id s19mr9882651waf.189.1215631984583;
Wed, 09 Jul 2008 12:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.127.8 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 12:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID:
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 15:33:04 -0400
From: "Gary Stone"
To: Victim 1
Subject:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_3967_25493890.1215631984586"

------=_Part_3967_25493890.1215631984586
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

I am calling you, I think you want to talk, but you are afraid, dont be afraid, I wont beat you up.

-------------------------------------

Received: by 10.114.127.8 with HTTP;
Sat, 19 Jul 2008 06:33:52 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID:
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 14:33:52 +0100
From: "Gary Stone"
To: Victim 1

Subject: Re: discuss this with me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_45387_27310100.1216474432452"
References:
Return-Path: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Jul 2008 13:33:54.0333 (UTC)
FILETIME=[169C9CD0:01C8E9A4]
------=_Part_45387_27310100.1216474432452
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline


I wont beat you up. Please talk.

-----------------------------

On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Gary Stone wrote:

> I would like to talk if you feel this book misrepresents you.

------------------------------

On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Gary Stone wrote:

>> IM back, I have a little while. Will you discuss this with me or will you>> stay in the shadows you have grown used to? I have coffee and I am ready to
>> talk. I am going to forward a non response from you to garderner, and remind
>> him, that in his presence you did not pose and an objection to this. I
>> really only want to make you suffer consequences equal to the damage you
>> have done to me, an mine. And move on. I dont have any love feelings
>> anymore, or hate feelings. I cant rationalize positive feelings, and hatred
>> only hurts me. But you are not forgiven obviosly, and thats because you wont
>> make amends.

----------------------------

Delivered-To: Victim 2
Received: by 10.86.49.8 with SMTP id w8cs24949fgw;
Sat, 13 Sep 2008 14:21:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.115.58.18 with SMTP id l18mr4640652wak.177.1221340889411;
Sat, 13 Sep 2008 14:21:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.127.8 with HTTP; Sat, 13 Sep 2008 14:21:29 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID:
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 17:21:29 -0400
From: "Gary Stone"
To: Victim 2
Subject: end your life on the spot.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_37879_13548303.1221340889402"
------=_Part_37879_13548303.1221340889402
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

I want you to understand, that if by design or accident you should ever come within 1500 hundred feet of me, given what I know about you, and given your vile nature, I would consider that a threat to my life, and I would end your life on the spot in self defense, no questions asked.

----------------------------

Delivered-To: Victim 2
Received: by 10.86.49.8 with SMTP id w8cs65255fgw;
Sun, 14 Sep 2008 14:22:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.115.79.8 with SMTP id g8mr5416206wal.215.1221427339719;
Sun, 14 Sep 2008 14:22:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.127.8 with HTTP; Sun, 14 Sep 2008 14:22:19 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID:
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 17:22:19 -0400
From: "Gary Stone"
To: Victim 2
Subject: Sleaze with cheese.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_45140_32884579.1221427339729"
------=_Part_45140_32884579.1221427339729
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

If I ever meet up with you Victim 2, I'm going to name the bones I'm going to break in latin before I break them. What is wrong with her? Is she soft? What the fuck does she see in you you miserable little coward. If you met up with me you'd run. Sleaze with cheese.

-----------------------

Delivered-To: Victim 1
Received: by 10.141.155.18 with SMTP id h18cs180026rvo;
Sun, 5 Oct 2008 05:39:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.115.75.14 with SMTP id c14mr4075115wal.45.1223210354206;
Sun, 05 Oct 2008 05:39:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.127.8 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Oct 2008 05:39:14 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID:
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 08:39:14 -0400
From: "Gary Stone"
To: Victim 1
Subject: dead sure, or dead.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_22061_214733.1223210354193"
------=_Part_22061_214733.1223210354193
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

fiesty this am aren't we. You'd better be dead sure, or dead.

---------------------------------

Number of Entries: 3 (2 this visit) Entry Page Time: xxxxxx Visit Length: 23 hours 7 mins 44 secs Browser: IE 8.0 OS: Win7 Resolution: 1600x900

Total Visits: 2 Location: Peabody, Massachusetts, United States IP Address: Comcast Cable (24.91.126.195) Gary Stone Referring URL: (No referring link) Entry Page: cyberpaths.blogspot.com/ Exit Page: cyberpaths.blogspot.com

Stone claims EOPC uses proxies and hacks people. We do not do either. We post stories with full permission from victims; given to us by victims. These victims take full, legal responsibility for their story, as reported. Other than giving these victims a voice, we do not and do not have the capabilities to get involved. Stone, of course, is paranoid and self-involved to point of thinking we are 'out to get him.' He keeps using proxies to read our site. We had blocked him in hopes that he would move on with his life instead of inventing more plots against him.

Some of Stone's Proxies (reported to us)
Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation 217.118.83.156
Kirov, Russian Federation 89.254.227.183
Kirovo-chepetsk, Kirov, Russian Federation 94.241.222.108
Kirov, Russian Federation 94.241.192.171
Kirov, Russian Federation 94.241.244.90 
Chisinau, Moldova, Republic of  89.149.115.19

Stone feeding his persecution complex (this is just one day):

Visit Length: 9 hours 40 mins 46 secs Browser: Chrome 23.0 OS: WinXP Resolution: 1280x800

Location: Peabody, Massachusetts, United States IP Address: Comcast Cable (75.68.233.140)

These days unemployed Stone is spending thousands of hours a year reading, re-reading, and RE-reading the same posts. Searching desperately for any reason to fabricate more plots against him or 'secret messages' we are sending him from some article one of the EOPC Team posted; or rewriting and rehashing his expose and his 'facts'.

The only one keeping everything going - is GARY STONE.