Online Players, Internet Predators, Cyberpaths, Dating Site Frauds, Cyberstalkers... whatever you call them - they need to be EXPOSED! Did they take your heart? your soul? your trust? Harass you? Tell your story... Share ideas for dealing with them... Share plans to change the internet laws to protect the innocent...
We are not responsible for contents on posts sent to us by others. Prior to threatening us, you may want to read: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=search&case=/uscircs/4th/971523p.html
or
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_230_of_the_Communications_Decency_Act
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material is made available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. §107, the material in this message is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
A MAN from rural north Northumberland threatened to post intimate pictures of his teenage ex-girlfriend online after their relationship broke down.
The man, who cannot be named for legal reasons, appeared in court in Berwick last week charged with harassing his ex-girlfriend’s father and grandmother.
The court heard he also called her a ‘dog’ and alleged she was promiscuous in texts to the 17 year-old’s father and grandmother.
Magistrates heard that the 26-year-old, who pleaded guilty, had sent the texts and made phone calls to his ex-girlfriend’s family after their two-year relationship broke down and she started seeing another man.
James Long, prosecuting, said the girl’s family had never approved of the relationship and when it ended he said the defendant sent a text message to her father which said ‘your daughter is a dog’.
This was then repeated in other texts the defendant sent to her father over a period of a few days in January.
Mr Long said that the girl’s grandmother also received phone calls and text messages from the defendant, which he said were ‘abusive and threatening’.
He said the defendant then started to threaten the girl’s grandmother that if they contacted the police he would post pictures of his ex-girlfriend on the internet.
Mr Long said that the grandmother believed from the threats that these pictures were of a ‘sexual nature’.
In other messages to the girl’s grandmother, the defendant called the teen a ‘dirty little slag’ and alleged she slept around.
Mr Long added that on receiving the first text the grandmother had replied that she was going to contact the police, while the girl’s father had not responded to any of them.
Ian O’Rourke, defending, said that his client and the 17-year-old had since got back together and were planning to move away in an attempt to re-build their relationship.
He said: “The defendant and X are now back together and their take on this is that it is just her family ganging up on him. It’s probable that the truth is somewhere in the middle. The context of this case is that X and the defendant had a relationship of in excess of two years. This started when she was 15 and at one stage she was pregnant and last year had a termination."
“It is fair to say that her family did not approve of the defendant – they did not get on at all. “They split up as there was another man involved and then text messages and telephone calls started going between the defendant and X, essentially being childish and abusive to each other. The defendant then involved her father in this and it is fair to say on his behalf that there are not that many messages to her dad.”
Mr O’Rourke added: “He accepts by his plea that it was quite wrong of him to send the texts to X’s father and grandmother at all. They were not appropriate at all and were conducive to harassment.
“The threats about putting photos on Facebook was a two-way thing, as X had intimate photos of him and threatened to put them on Facebook. It does seem rather childish,” he said.
The case was adjourned for three weeks for reports.
(ALBERTA, CANADA) Annoyed at his neighbours calling city bylaw enforcement about him and another neighbour, Michael Kenzie MacLeod embarked on a nine-month spree of ruthlessly harassing them through the Internet.
MacLeod, 35, who said he was formerly friends with Robert and Kathy Smith, set up e-mail accounts in their name that resulted in fictitious ads being placed on a local Internet website to sell merchandise.
As a result of personal ads, which contained her name and address, Kathy Smith received hundreds of phone calls from people wishing to buy items and obscene calls and visits to their door from men who believed they had corresponded with her about having sexual encounters.
MacLeod pleaded guilty Thursday to criminal harassment.
Crown prosecutor Nadine Nesbitt, who argued for a conditional jail sentence of 18 months with house arrest, said in reading an agreed statement of facts in court Thursday that MacLeod posed in the e-mails as being Kathy Smith.
Smith said in her victim impact statement that MacLeod’s actions were “relentless psychological torture” that caused her family to fear for her life.
“I could have been killed by a stranger sent to our door,” she said, choking back tears. Due to the proximity of the offender, I was deprived of peace in my own home. My family and I were selected targets.
“I felt like I was imprisoned in my own home. I was face to face with an unidentified man . . . today, I saw my attacker for the first time and, even though it’s been over for a year, I still live in fear.”
Nesbitt said the offender’s actions were often very disturbing in nature.
“On Sept. 6, 2008, Kathy Smith received a phone call from an unknown male that was very sexually graphic,” she told provincial court Judge Anne Brown. “The male told Kathy Smith in very vulgar terms what he would like to do with her sexually. The male called (her) several times and told her he was responding to her personal ad on usedcalgary.com and he was the person still communicating with her using her e-mail address.”
That man was eventually traced through a pay phone and video surveillance and, although not charged by police, was fired from his job.
Also, Kathy Smith received an “e-mail bomb” from MacLeod, which included 250 similar e-mails over a couple of hours on Jan. 17, 2009, virtually crippling her system.
It purported to be from the Canadian Mental Health Association and was entitled, “CMHA are watching you.”
The offender also used another neighbour’s unsecured wireless router to send many of the e-mails, resulting in police tracing them to the neighbours’ home, seizing their computers and taking them in for questioning.
MacLeod also posted many of the fictitious ads using his laptop computer while visiting China and Orlando, Fla.
Nesbitt said part of his sentence should include a condition that he take counselling for anger management. Defence lawyer Jim Lutz sought a similar conditional sentence, albeit 12 months long.
He noted his client believed he just set up the calls or meetings through the ads and did not have control over what happened afterward.
That prompted Brown to quip, “It’s a bit like loading a weapon and giving it to someone.”
Robert Smith said in his victim impact statement that he and his family have been devastated by the crimes that still affect them because, despite efforts by police to remove any reference to the ads, they still can be called up and have their home address on them.
They have had to change phone numbers and e-mail addresses they have used for 20 years.
“We have been and still are paralyzed from this crime. I wake up at night thinking about these crimes,” Smith said in his statement. “We don’t know who has our phone number or address and will show up at our door.
“For four months in 2008, Kathy was harassed with phone calls, some saying they were coming to our house. The callers also seemed to know when I was leaving. One caller said I just left and said he and a friend were coming to our house later that day.”
MacLeod apologized to the Smiths for his actions before the judge adjourned sentencing.
“I wasn’t fully aware of all the impact it had on you, until I heard your statements today,” he said. “I’m sorry for that.”
[Dr. Robert Hare (foremost authority in psychopaths] calls them "subclinical" psychopaths. They're the charming predators who, unable to form real emotional bonds, find and use vulnerable women for sex, playing games and money (and inevitably abandon them).
[this brings to mind Dunetz/ Yidwithlid - who posted reviews of his lunch hour liaisons on bigdoggie.net and theeroticreview.com (and now says either 'the reviews were planted by his Targets' or 'denies it ever happened'... despite the police finding his IP and credit card number associated with the reviews! )
And Dan Jacoby who posted on sexforums (and probably elsewhere)]:
Robyn Few, a former prostitute who lobbies to decriminalize prostitution as executive director of the Sex Workers Outreach Project in San Francisco, said that on a personal level, “I hate it” that women are “being reviewed and rated like some subhuman.”
The sites represent the ultimate commodification of women, who are impersonally rated by anonymous men in much the same way they would judge a sports car or a racehorse.
So its a given that these cyberpaths don't think of their victims any differently! Their Targets are AnonymousTHINGS, existing only in cyberspace or for their sexual & emotional kicks. [Otherwise - victims are nothing & no one to them.]
Psychopaths can be found in legislatures, hospitals, and used-car lots. They're your neighbor, your boss, and your blind date. Because they have no conscience, they're natural predators. If you didn't have a conscience, you'd be one too.
"The con man works one-on-one," says Babiak. "They'll go after a woman, marry her, take her money (trust/ love/ sex...), then move on and marry someone else. The puppet master would manipulate somebody to get at someone else. This type is more powerful because they're hidden." Babiak says psychopaths have three motivations:
thrill-seeking,
the pathological desire to win,
and the inclination to hurt people.
"They'll jump on any opportunity that allows them to do those things," he says. "If something better comes along, they'll drop you and move on."
On How the Internet Scares Me So Much I Might Never Want To Use It Ever Again
Do you feel empowered by the internet? Discuss in relation to the recent federal election in USA.
If you have yet to read my paper on social networking site, Facebook, and the dangers associating yourself with it then that ought to answer the question, along with the title of this blog entry. I felt so naive researching for my paper. How could I have thought that just because my "privacy settings" were up, that I would be protected from people? I even was unaware that my own profile was allowing data to be accessed without my permission.
Two years ago, I was being stalked on and offline by a boy I'd met through a mutual friend. We went out a few times and it didn't work out. He harassed me, he called me all the time, left messages on AIM and my phone. Even when I said I didn't want anything to do with him, he'd go away a couple days then come back to tell me that if I didn't want to "be" with him, he would make me very sorry. Mentioning shootings on campus (before April 16, 2007) such as "standing on the drill field and picking people off" and cause harm to me and those I loved. My roommates, friends and my dog who hated him (for good reason; I've never seen my puppy bite someone before him). I felt stuck. I was trapped, as long as I made a little contact. Even if it was "I hate you, leave me alone" bi-weekly, he would make less threats.
How do you reject someone who creeps you out so bad? I was scared to sleep at night, I was scared to I avoided dining halls, I was fearful leaving my puppy at home thinking I might come back to some murder scene. I felt insane thinking that this one person might do something on-campus. Things like that just didn't happen. Right?
I went to the Women's Center to ask them what I might do and they helped me file a cyberstalking and stalking report. I felt ashamed to be putting this horrible label to someone who I thought was clearly ill.
When it was brought up to the school in November of 2006, the school dismissed it saying he was "not responsible". They felt even with hard copies of evidence provided with text messages, emails and instant messages; that cyberstalking wasn't likely.
I had already filed a report with Virginia Tech police, and thus Blacksburg Police, so the trial was set for April 2007. A week after April 16th. (GOOD FOR HER! Don't let police blow you off!)
He was found guilty. Only after a real live case blew up to something no one imagined could spawn from cyberstalking and a mentally ill derangement about our own campus, did this sort of crime seem "real" in Southwest Virginia. I am still waiting for a 2009 hearing to see if he will go to jail or not.
Cyberstalking is real.
Facebook, myspace, blogger are giving away your personal information.Your credit cards, if you used [them]. Your addresses you put on your profile, your phone numbers, your dog's name, your favorite ice cream flavor. Your face.
I got off track, but I wanted to show how it starts online. I feel frustrated and worried in this way.
I also feel that being online is wonderful in other ways though.The Internet is a wonderful form of media, it is also not in the same way. There are millions of users, millions and billions of writings, more facts and figures that you could think about and anything you want to learn about, you can find online. It's great to have that sort of power at your fingertips. Things that I never would have known about, I can learn online. [snipped]
I guess like anything, you have people who abuse the power and people who embrace it in a good way.
We all can cause harm to others using the Internet, there are ways to inject evil towards others with a short little Google search we could steal identities, stalk and threat, invade privacy and treat people like dirt.
It comes down to ethics and morals; if you're gonna believe everything you read or see or hear.
Punishing narcissists [by exposing them] is not being mean to them. It may be the only thing that can help. And, as for their victims, it is simple justice, the right thing to do for their sake too. - What Makes Narcissists Tick
What is the predator thinking? What's going on in the mystery behind those steely blue eyes? What do they see in you?
Something to love for anything but lunch?
How many tiger-tamers and lion-tamers have fooled themselves into thinking they had developed a relationship with these beasts? Fooled themselves into unknowing that every minute of every day in the cage that tiger was tempted.
That's what tiger-taming is - astounding an audience with the audacity of dangling yourself as bait before a predator.
Until one day, when out of the blue, almost off-handedly, Tiger hops down off the pedestal and eats the tamer to just be done with it already.
How many times have authorities similarly fooled themselves about a child molester, rapist, or serial killer - thinking they can safely be released from prison? Then, out on the street, bait is constantly dangled before their eyes.
Sooner or later....
One might as well expect a wolf to be lovey-dovey with lambs or expect that tiger to roam the streets without hurting anyone. It ain't gonna happen.
It's all because of the way a predator VIEWS you. There is no connection in that look. It's a tiger and you aren't - you are lunch.
A narcissist has no proper relationship with him- or her-self (N's identify with their image instead of their buried inner selves),so how can they have a proper human relationship with anyone else? They see nothing to identify with in you.
Predators - the way to deal with them is simply to get and stay a safe distance away from them. They may resist the temptation today, but if you keep dangling bait before their eyes, sooner or later you know what is going to happen. So let no one tell you it's mean to divorce one or cut off contact with one. I don't care how much the narcissist cries about it or even if he or she threatens suicide if you leave. People might as well tell you that you have a moral obligation to remain within striking distance of a great white shark because it's mean to stay away and let it go hungry. Absurd.
A predator has no RIGHT to prey, no claim on your life that you must fulfill by allowing them to use you as their whipping boy.
It's just too bad that they will be sad and unhappy without one, because that's THEIR problem: you have a right to pursue your own happiness.
If you read this site, are a victim of abuse, have ever visited an abuse site, advocate for abuse victims or cyberpath victims - beware: GUARDIAN IS ON THE CASE!!!
An troll named Betsy Ashby - nicknamed Guardian has been in touch with Gary Stone, our 2 1/2 year harasser and 4 year harasser of his victims, who was just reprofiled, to let him know who they believe EOPC is and with "proof" of who we are! lol...
Sandra Brown has never communicated with me. Guardian has, and I have her name, her phone.Guardian, has sent me pdf files, citing law suits against XXX,and in one of the pdf, it is clear, XXX's hard drive, is under subpoena.I am not obliged to reveal this information, but the case is filed in MO. I have had numerous visits to my varieuswars with you from Mo as well. I have guardian's full information.And, she says to me, that Sandra Brown MA, from northCarolina, does not endorse you. I have guardian's phone,and her website. And her name. The emphasis in the phonecall was placed, on sandra brown's dissassociation from yourblog. The caller named XXX, as one of two corrent writers XXX being the other. Lisa Scott, is also a "suspect"fighter, per Betsy, the first name of guardian. The blog she referred me to was writtern primarily by XXX and XXX,"the foul mouth one" is XXX
Gary Stone ......................
fromGary Stone backbeatone@gmail.com dateFri, May 20, 2011 at 3:39 PM hide details May 20 (2 days ago)
I wont be forewarding the email to the source. Stop playing gane
Guardian is going to feed Stone and her minions on Cassiopaea.org the names of people she doesn't like to cyberpaths in her proxy recruitment of harassers.And she's going to dig up 'evidence' even if its 20 years old or invalid or fabricated, keep screaming loud & long hoping that will give it the air of 'truth' and force it to fit! LOL
.......................
Don't confuse Stone with reality, readers - Guardian has told him everything he needs to know. LOL
Guardian aka Betsy Ashby appears to be a woman from North Carolina (our ruse got her to rant and in her making fun of us - give us further information) who has been trolling the net for years and has been banned from or kicked off of numerous abuse support sites, native american, new age and pagan sites in the past.
She decided to bestow her bounty of erroneous, assumed secret 'facts' on Stone as her proxy to harass and hassle people who have called her on what she does to other victims in the past. She purposely fed Stone the names of people she (and her BFF Sandra Brown, MA) wants harassed; one of them just happens to be an old victim of a cyberpath who Stone keeps poking at; and she strung together her research to make it seem plausible; Making it seem she's "figured it all out" and is just helping poor Stone!
Stone believes because Ashby gave him her phone number and "name" she must actually know something! He doesn't realize he's being used and this whole thing will only torpedo whatever chance at a 'case' he may still have had. She strung together a bunch of unrelated facts, sprinkled in some lies, assumptions and misstatements and presented it as a cohesive whole. Sound familiar, readers?
She's not 'helping' anyone - she's simply starting one of her many smear campaigns, which she has done in the past. With too much time on her hands, she's online causing trouble. She seems to be fixated on a handful of people. She's not exposing anyone who's abusing the internet and others - she's decided to ASSIST poor poor cyberpaths, harassers & predators who DESERVED to be exposed! Perhaps this handful of people she attacks have caught her or her friends doing things they shouldn't have been?
Ashby issued dozens of threats of lawsuits, none of which were ever carried out. In fact, her lawyer's tactics were so sleazy and unethical, he faced being disbarred and only avoided any action from his state bar by concealing his address.
And as already pointed out , when she [Ashby] doesn't like someone she appears very willing to ignore obvious information that casts her so called documentation into doubt.
Betsy Ashby has a talent for selecting the facts that support the point she wants to make, inventing a few things that aren't fact at all, and leaving out everything that doesn't support the story she wants people to believe .
Yes, Ashby's campaigns have been a spectacular and downright laughable failure.
Since we started in 2005, the ONLY ones interested in who we are - are ALWAYS THOSE WE EXPOSE!!!
Guardian thinks that if abuse victims know each other, if bloggers know each other - then LOGICALLY they are all in cahootsagainst innocent people like GARY STONE!!! ROFL!
Guardian said our anonymity = weak yet we don't see her advertising who she is. We see her shrieking about anyone who is digging up information about her yet she feels totally justified to post people's addresses, phone numbers, employers, children - online. All things we never do because it can and does harm innocent people and is actionable as a part of IDENTITY THEFT!
No, we see her trouble-making and feeling all powerful behind a keyboard. Sounds a bit like a cyberpath. Who we are is immaterial to anyone but a cyberpath, predator or harasser that we catch.Those innocent people Guardian is trying very very hard to TIE TOGETHER; none of whom are us and most of whom we DID NOT EVEN KNOW UNTIL NOW... have been kind enough to show us their evidence of GUARDIAN's malicious stalking!! (more coming and when it does we will post it):
Here's just ONE our statistics on Guardian's many visits here:
Entry Page Time: 20 May 2011 07:53:47 PM Visit Length: 32 mins 7 secs Browser: Firefox 3.5 OS: WinVista Resolution: 1280x800 Location: United States IP Address: Frontier Communications (50.55.222.199) Referring URL: http://www.google.com/ gary stone Entry Page: http://cyberpaths.blogspot.com/ Exit Page: http://cyberpaths.blogspot.com/
Location: United States IP Address: Frontier Communications (50.55.222.199) 16 May 04:48:56 PM file:///C:/Users/Public/Downloads/PredatorArchive/ahc/st-melissa-kester-livin-in-victimhood.html (No referring link) 16 May 04:51:23 PM file:///C:/Users/Public/Downloads/PredatorArchive/ahc/melissa-kester-preyed-upon-and-bilked.html (No referring link) 16 May 04:54:54 PM file:///C:/Users/Public/Downloads/PredatorArchive/ahc/my-dead-psychopath-my-film.html (No referring link) 16 May 05:01:35 PM file:///C:/Users/Public/Downloads/PredatorArchive/ahc/anyone-else-see-uncanny-resemblance.html (No referring link) 16 May 05:05:05 PM file:///C:/Users/Public/Downloads/PredatorArchive/ahc/payday.html (No referring link) 19 May 02:34:50 PM file:///C:/Users/Public/Downloads/PredatorArchive/ahc/anyone-else-see-uncanny-resemblance.html (No referring link) 19 May 02:36:49 PM file:///C:/Users/Public/Downloads/PredatorArchive/ahc/her-pathological-games.html (No referring link) 19 May 02:45:42 PM file:///C:/Users/Guardian/Documents/_MaryM/ahc/screenwriter-melissa-kester-what-joke.html (No referring link) 19 May 02:52:14 PM file:///C:/Users/Guardian/Documents/_MaryM/ahc/waxed-skankfish-im-sure-kester-gets.html
__________________ Guardian has a lot on her hard drive, doesn't she? She's the judge & jury with her "PREDATOR ARCHIVE"!
___________________
Guardian has a specific agenda against certain people and she's trying to play them against one another. Guardian must have way too much time on her hands!
(you do know Guardian - DOWNLOADING THESE THINGS FROM PEOPLE'S BLOGS IS A COPYRIGHT VIOLATION UNDER FEDERAL LAW??? oh wait, Guardian "knows" the law because Guardian "is" the law - on her planet.)
Guardian says she's got SCREENSHOTS of people's COMPUTERS!! That's an admission of hacking... too late Guardian - we took a screenshot of that post on Cassiopea and passed it along to those you're accusing so they can take it to Frontier Communications and law enforcment as EVIDENCE OF HACKING... another Federal offense. BTW - our screen shot? Was on an open, public forum... not someone's private computer.
On top of that, we have made no secret that XXX has allowed us to use her miniserver since 2005 as thanks for outing her cyberpath. We have proxy servers that we can just plug server numbers into - so it looks like we could be any one of the millions of people using the same server and IP as XXX. XXX is a DV advocate who has helped many many other advocates such as us: Sandra Brown, MA; Dr. Robert Hare and so on. Are you merely a psychopath trying to attack those of us who fight to educate people about someone like you? Nice try, Guardian!
And why your very unnatural and perverted interest? or in cyberstalking XXX and XXX? aside from helping poor, poor Gary Stone?? what's YOUR agenda Guardian? Linking Lissa Daly (from Australia or New Zealand) to the targets of your stalking and rage? Who cares about lawsuits, web postings or comments by others who may be some of the victims we support?? or someone we don't even know?? You seem to have a lot of time to stalk and harass people, Guardian - or give innocent names to people like Stone to get them to participate in your game playing? Who cares? We care about the victims we support & validate.
What is clear is that you seem more interested in hurting as many unrelated, blameless people as you can with your ridiculous assumptions. And feeding these people to someone like Stone as 'proof' of something you have 'uncovered'? -- you're an idiot Guardian.
BEWARE FELLOW BLOGGERS: Frontier Communications on your statistics? in your hits? It's GUARDIAN ON THE CASE!
for JUST some of the incoherent ravings of Gary Stone that he got from his new BFF "Guardian" CLICK HERE
Betsy/ Guardian keeps feeding Stone's persecution complex then sitting back to enjoy the show. (much like Scott Powers did!!)
Here's just some of Guardian's venom against EOPC and innocent people they want Stone and others to think are us, using cult leader Laura Knight Jadcyzk's Cassiopaea forum to do it (read the last 5 or 6 posts) http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=8379.msg258751#new
Guardian - you're cyberstalking people and passing along twisted "facts" to known crazies in order to make trouble -- and we're on to you. You thought you could destroy this blog and harm innocent people at the same time. Once we find out everything about you - you'll be exposed too.
Seems you do this harassing - accusing - stalking A LOT Guardian, er Betsy, er Bettie, er Nancy:
Betsy Guardain claims to defend people from predators but defends the predators she likes. .. I see a false Guardian. A Guardian who thinks shes the exception to her own rules. I call that hypocracy. I call that deceptive and corrupt.
It is also deeply troubling that Laura Knight Jadzyck is aiding in your smear and disinformation campaign.
Don't you remember the old saying that 'when you throw mud at others your own hands get dirty.' No? how about the one about throwing stones when you live in a GLASS HOUSE?
CHECK MATE, Guardian
_____________________
Sandra Brown, MA's volunteer office assistant, advocate and helper is GUARDIAN. When you get email from Brown - it may not be from her but from BETSY ASHBY! You may be pouring your heart out to a serial harasser.:
Bettie (Betsy). Ashby
Out of the Dark, Inc..
76XX Whispering Pines Trail
Windsor, VA 23487
(757) XXX-0664
----------------
Anyone with more information about Ashby/ Guardian's online activities - please contact us. (we are not interested in her family, address or phone number or their jobs, just her online 'busy' work)
(POSSIBLE TRIGGER WARNING TO ABUSE VICTIMS; STRONG LANGUAGE WARNING ALSO)
What is disturbing about these messages is the extreme-range swings in mood from Stone. His disregard for Victim 1 & 2's minor child; his assumption that Victim 1 wants to speak to him (she didn't); his threats and attempted provocations.
For victims who may already have trauma issues, such as PTSD or even illness - these threats can provoke extreme fear. While some may find these messages from Stone harmless - we can never know when someone this unpredictable may snap..
In 3+ years, Stone simply will not stop. Everything usual has been tried. EOPC even took down his expose by request of his victims for over 2 years; still the emails and accusations continue unabated. Legal remedies against these are currently being further explored by Stone's victims:
Delivered-To: stonybox@gmail.com Received: by 10.64.242.13 with SMTP id p13cs420983qbh; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 06:00:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.6.16 with SMTP id j16mr6842443ybi.213.1208782855754; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 06:00:55 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from QMTA10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.17]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 62si7754081wri.30.2008.04.21.06.00.54; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 06:00:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of backbeatone@comcast.net designates 76.96.30.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=76.96.30.17; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of backbeatone@comcast.net designates 76.96.30.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=backbeatone@comcast.net Received: from OMTA13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.52]) by QMTA10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id GAeS1Z00317UAYkAA0GM00; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:00:08 +0000 Received: from GARY ([24.147.56.158]) by OMTA13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id GD0a1Z0013QpPGg8Z00000; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:00:51 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=rITDv7nW5hcA:10 a=qX23_jeXr9QKfTubGy8A:9 a=1_THaeZgReqIjVC3Cr5478f2CPMA:4 a=M15ajoi-1mQA:10 a=RPEWlWjmHvBrYwuazmoA:9 a=fRoY0Z9-3uGuaP9gzwQA:7 a=ZC1k3cNbuOJNgrqZwvYAnChBnp8A:4 a=AfD3MYMu9mQA:10 a=ep27abeu6QIyZj3T4wsA:9 a=SlEUxUnRHq0bKptqJ5pIHpoBDEQA:4 a=1Vq_FK4TplAA:10 a=CxA2Utj4LuEA:10 a=8cjj7p-wvfYw1SkCzqQA:9 a=GHq9ccWGwT5QU65o:18 a=PslmfTQ_jD8JqWeu:18 a=Pb2SVzHt4CljGM5T:18 a=R4LhTN6DCaoNIwdWUxUA:9 a=wKbvbaRfYCKVaIy8MQ_Z8aDeJGUA:4 a=KQqxNPgzF0kA:10 a=bC4pTEGzVWIA:10 a=UgPg92xnMUx7xZnr:18 Message-ID: <007701c8a3af$ac2eed60$6501a8c0@GARY> Reply-To: "Gary Stone" From: "Gary Stone" To: "Victim 1" Subject: brat Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 09:00:26 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; type="multipart/alternative"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0073_01C8A38E.241AF890" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 fromGary Stone reply-toGary Stone
date21 April 2008 13:00 subjectbrat mailed-bycomcast.net
hide details 21/04/2008 Reply
Fuck [Victim 1 & 2's minor child]! tell Victim 2 I said that. She's a brat. he knows where I live.
---------------------------------
Delivered-To: stonybox@gmail.com Received: by 10.151.51.5 with SMTP id d5cs54446ybk; Tue, 20 May 2008 12:03:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.202.15 with SMTP id z15mr9253731waf.72.1211310237545; Tue, 20 May 2008 12:03:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.123.16 with HTTP; Tue, 20 May 2008 12:03:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 15:03:57 -0400 From: "Gary Stone" To: Victim 1 and Victim 2 Subject: heres a twist MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3100_18262370.1211310237539"
Exploit yer selves change authorship book haha abd sell it yourselves. Er...boob, how r ya? You got Victim 1 in a shit load of trouble with yer changed ways. When i am done with you old chap, they wont let you on the front porch. I hope you don't have designs on that house, i am writing XXXX, and ask her to check my facts son. I will ask her that she shouldwill, under XXXX supervision, that Victim 1 can only live there if you are not involved, she can include me too for all I care. You see son, you don't endanger the people you live with, and, you don't hope to dance on their graves, its a common courtesy. It;s u I want babe. Now you did threaten me,and I am waiting, here i am. No weapons, just natural. fair. u game? boy?
I don't appreciate you sending that to my daughter, and so i have a bone to pick with you, I will let you have first punch it'll be yer last one.
You got a little to cute with me, and I am asking u if you want to dance/ Imhere. I wll sign all rights away, you can publish under XXX. XXXX, what do you say> er boob, bob. Victim 2 the acct is mine now, XXXX has another, Victim 1 you gave Victim 2 my daughters email, did Victim 1 make you do it?.Maybe you can hide in Ireland. .Could the irish tolerate the smell? right here youngster, haha.
--------------------------------------
Delivered-To: Victim 1 Received: by 10.150.216.5 with SMTP id o5cs407477ybg; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:54:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.146.1 with SMTP id t1mr4688133wad.76.1213480497297; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:54:57 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from QMTA02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.24]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l37si5447022waf.23.2008.06.14.14.54.56; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:54:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of backbeatone@comcast.net designates 76.96.30.24 as permitted sender) client-ip=76.96.30.24; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of backbeatone@comcast.net designates 76.96.30.24 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=backbeatone@comcast.net Received: from OMTA03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.27]) by QMTA02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id dvHg1Z0010b6N64A20AF00; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 21:54:56 +0000 Received: from GARY ([24.91.151.21]) by OMTA03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id dxuX1Z0050Tx2SY8Pxuv9g; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 21:54:56 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=rITDv7nW5hcA:10 a=ZRrvm2JOuL3XyFbeQrYA:9 a=6Eewo1wQTbNoV_alu6BvqCxcir4A:4 a=M15ajoi-1mQA:10 a=RPEWlWjmHvBrYwuazmoA:9 a=aW8Gg4kQ2Bnt7HtbtTAA:7 a=-UReDNFxjMEGJCZaIew2QpVilIMA:4 a=AfD3MYMu9mQA:10 a=ep27abeu6QIyZj3T4wsA:9 a=SlEUxUnRHq0bKptqJ5pIHpoBDEQA:4 a=CxA2Utj4LuEA:10 a=1Vq_FK4TplAA:10 a=8cjj7p-wvfYw1SkCzqQA:9 a=GHq9ccWGwT5QU65o:18 a=PslmfTQ_jD8JqWeu:18 a=Pb2SVzHt4CljGM5T:18 a=R4LhTN6DCaoNIwdWUxUA:9 a=wKbvbaRfYCKVaIy8MQ_Z8aDeJGUA:4 a=bC4pTEGzVWIA:10 a=KQqxNPgzF0kA:10 a=UgPg92xnMUx7xZnr:18 Message-ID: <002101c8ce69$2e905d00$6501a8c0@GARY> Reply-To: "Gary Stone" From: "Gary Stone" To: Victim 1 Subject: reasons Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 17:54:08 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; type="multipart/alternative"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001D_01C8CE47.A5061BE0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 date14 June 2008 21:54 subjectreasons mailed-bycomcast.net
hide details 14/06/2008 Reply
You are a pig and a slut. You are amoung the lowest pieces of shit, I have ever encountered. I was re-reading the reasons for the report, and I take back my apology for calling you a cunt. You are a cunt, and worse. I shouln't be apologizing to you for anything, you pathetic skank. Street walker have more ethics than you do...
----------------------------
Delivered-To: Victim 1 Received: by 10.150.216.5 with SMTP id o5cs49910ybg; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 12:33:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.195.19 with SMTP id s19mr9882651waf.189.1215631984583; Wed, 09 Jul 2008 12:33:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.127.8 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 12:33:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 15:33:04 -0400 From: "Gary Stone" To: Victim 1 Subject: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3967_25493890.1215631984586"
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Gary Stone wrote:
> I would like to talk if you feel this book misrepresents you.
------------------------------
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Gary Stone wrote:
>> IM back, I have a little while. Will you discuss this with me or will you >> stay in the shadows you have grown used to? I have coffee and I am ready to >> talk. I am going to forward a non response from you to garderner, and remind >> him, that in his presence you did not pose and an objection to this. I >> really only want to make you suffer consequences equal to the damage you >> have done to me, an mine. And move on. I dont have any love feelings >> anymore, or hate feelings. I cant rationalize positive feelings, and hatred >> only hurts me. But you are not forgiven obviosly, and thats because you wont >> make amends.
----------------------------
Delivered-To: Victim 2 Received: by 10.86.49.8 with SMTP id w8cs24949fgw; Sat, 13 Sep 2008 14:21:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.58.18 with SMTP id l18mr4640652wak.177.1221340889411; Sat, 13 Sep 2008 14:21:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.127.8 with HTTP; Sat, 13 Sep 2008 14:21:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 17:21:29 -0400 From: "Gary Stone" To: Victim 2 Subject: end your life on the spot. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_37879_13548303.1221340889402" ------=_Part_37879_13548303.1221340889402 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline
I want you to understand, that if by design or accident you should ever come within 1500 hundred feet of me, given what I know about you, and given your vile nature, I would consider that a threat to my life, and I would end your life on the spot in self defense, no questions asked.
----------------------------
Delivered-To: Victim 2 Received: by 10.86.49.8 with SMTP id w8cs65255fgw; Sun, 14 Sep 2008 14:22:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.79.8 with SMTP id g8mr5416206wal.215.1221427339719; Sun, 14 Sep 2008 14:22:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.127.8 with HTTP; Sun, 14 Sep 2008 14:22:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 17:22:19 -0400 From: "Gary Stone" To: Victim 2 Subject: Sleaze with cheese. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_45140_32884579.1221427339729" ------=_Part_45140_32884579.1221427339729 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline
If I ever meet up with you Victim 2, I'm going to name the bones I'm going to break in latin before I break them. What is wrong with her? Is she soft? What the fuck does she see in you you miserable little coward. If you met up with me you'd run. Sleaze with cheese.
-----------------------
Delivered-To: Victim 1 Received: by 10.141.155.18 with SMTP id h18cs180026rvo; Sun, 5 Oct 2008 05:39:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.75.14 with SMTP id c14mr4075115wal.45.1223210354206; Sun, 05 Oct 2008 05:39:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.127.8 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Oct 2008 05:39:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 08:39:14 -0400 From: "Gary Stone" To: Victim 1 Subject: dead sure, or dead. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_22061_214733.1223210354193" ------=_Part_22061_214733.1223210354193 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline
fiesty this am aren't we. You'd better be dead sure, or dead. ---------------------------------
These days unemployed Stone is spending thousands of hours a year reading, re-reading, and RE-reading this site. Searching desperately for any reason to file a DCMA takedown notice on some article one of the EOPC Team posted; or rewriting and rehashing his expose.
The only one keeping everything going - is GARY STONE.
The concept of the flame war online is certainly nothing new. It's been around since before most people were even aware the internet existed. However, more people are starting to look into the issue of why people tend to be such incredible jerks online when they might be perfectly nice in person. It seems that there are few different things contributing to the effect.
First is that people somehow feel "disinhibited" when sitting behind a keyboard and monitor -- whether it's because of the supposed anonymity, the fact that you're effectively "invisible" or even the fact that there's a time lag between being a jerk and any response to it. The fact that you're somewhat separate from the response just makes it that much easier to be a jerk.
Some feel that it has even more to do with the lack of direct human contact in terms of either seeing hurt feelings or hearing someone's voice. There's just less empathy involved in seeing black and white text then seeing a physical reaction to being mean. Some of the latest research on this actually looked at how brains process messages during a conversation, and noted that in a normal conversation the person is tracking a variety of different cues in terms of how the other person is responding, and those cues help moderate what we say. Without any such cues when sitting behind a keyboard, you don't get any of the warning lights to moderate what you're saying, and the natural tendency is just to go right to the extreme edge without ever cooling off.
(Right now, EOPC is dealing with a couple individuals - one on another discussion board where we occassionally post; who have strung together a bunch of unrelated facts to try and indict us for our anonymity. Most of the facts revolve around an old victim we helped who they are trying to 'prove' is us. This victim went on to do a lot of work with DV victims like herself. Unfortunately DV advocated attract just as many disordered naysayers who are desperate to place blame as we do. We are hanging in there.
If things like this are happening to you - take a breath and step back before you react to accusations or disordered or negative individuals (such as your cyberpath) who string together unrelated things in attempts to construct a 'gotcha' moment for you. If you try to defend yourself? These 'jerks' will take it as your 'admission of guilt' thereby setting up a no win situation for you. Stay in what you know to be truth and distance yourself from these types of people. We are.)
Of course, so far, it doesn't seem like the research is coming up with many good solutions to get people to moderate what they say online -- other than suggesting that using video communications might help. Other than that, perhaps just being more conscious of the fact that it really is a human being at the other end might help -- but so far that kind of "self awareness" hasn't caught on. And, even if it has, as long as one person in the group is unable to moderate his or her speech, it tends to set off many others as well.
From Stone's FACEBOOK account (sent to EOPC by his victims)
Gary Stone XXXX says I respond to myself, nope I just type on my board 19 minutes ago ·Like ·
Gary Stone only shoty comments are allowed on the status bar, people can read them now or later. I am simply writing , I don't respond to my self XXX 18 minutes ago · Like
Gary Stone haha 18 minutes ago · Like
Gary Stone He stalks this page 18 minutes ago · Like
Gary Stone He would call this me respond ing to me. I only respond to Dana Franchitto 16 minutes ago · Like
Gary Stone Earl went to heavne and he thinks he s better than everyone because only he was talken to heaven. Meanwhile the wiccans have fired at my wand again - missed and caused a volcano in Iceland again, they're aim has not improved much 15 minutes ago · Like
Gary Stone I try to separate it out because I can see it better XXX? 13 minutes ago · Like
Gary Stone Im reponding to you, you fairy 12 minutes ago · Like
Gary Stone The XXX fairy thread one 12 minutes ago · Like
Write a comment...
Gary Stone This weirdo had better respond or be sued 2 hours ago ·Like ·
Gary Stone I have directed centail british crime home office 19 minutes ago · Like Write a comment...
Gary Stone XXX: stuff your death threats, XXX, Facebook XXX (XXX, facebook), alleged death threats, XXX Scotand, challenge Alledging death threats is a violent act. ...
3 hours ago ·Like · · Share XXXX: stuff your death threats, XXX, Facebook by Gary Stone on Sunday, May 22, 2011 at 5:50pm XXX (XXXX, facebook), alleged death threats, XXX Scotand, challenge
Alledging death threats is a violent act.
At the cassopiae forums XXX, you have made false allegations of stalking and other sensational statments, none of which you prove.
You call yourself Victim 1, and take no responsibilty for what you say.
You also make statements that I have made "death threats." I have not made "any" death threats, if you continue to make such allegations, these statements will be taken to a British court. under the general heading of "defamation," under which the character of these alleged threats -
will be reviewed in light of the hundreds of other false statements you have have made on the internet about me, my wife and children. Made to eopc, and at Ic3.gov.. You are challenged now - to produce proof of these alleged death threats by forewarding to "me" all communications in which you have interpreted the content as a threat to you life. Include full headers, so these can be examined forenscially. Emails generated from any of my known emails or anonymous emails. I do not use anonymous remailer, or any anonymous emails or conduct any anonymous activity. You do, you use Bit torrent and hidemyass.com so does XXX.
Failure to produce this evidence to me is an act of pure cowardice, and it is testimony their character. It implies you simply want to say these things. This will not go unchallenged. Prove it to me.
Proof, does not mean rushing to others and trying to convince them behind my back anonymously as Victim 1 at EOPC,
Convince me Ms XXX, using your full name.
Otherwise, cease and desist from histrionic manipulative smears, the behavior you employ so often to get an emotional rise out of others to get your way. I have made zero death threats, and if I had, the FBI would have made taken issue with me, when you filed your case with them, that case was successfully answered, But your passive aggresssion and the these kinds of threats come from others you know.
Scott Powers made similar allegations in 09 and would not produce the evidence either. Powers alleged the same to my wife, in August 09. It seems false death threats are the way he gets his way (on the other hand XXX, I have recieved veiled threats from XXX, and EOPC and Jdog, which are highly suspect for physical threats. )
Powers had threatened in the past to allege I made death threats against him to ward off a civil suit. He abused my wife in december of 2009, saying that if I didn't remove his name from a civil suit he would call peobody police and make those allegations. A man who would allege charges of that have corporal consequences to me, to avoid civil consequences to himself, is a dangerous man.
He failed to produce these alleged threats to me, or to my lawyer, and lost his license to practice as a process server in Clinton OK, as a result of these and other false allegations. Most of which, you have made. You have damaged his career, by leading mamipulating him with hysteria. (Powers has abused my wife twice on the phone)
XXXX's cease and desist sent to me was dissected in the presence of peobody police as histrionic nonsense. I said to Ms XXX, that she was the type to lie in wait until i go to the market and then start screaming "Mengle Mengle he is a monster!!!" as tho I were a concentration camp anager. I would be there to get bread and milk. This kind of theater does get attention. Luckily she lives in XXX I live in peabody, I am legally blind, and can't "stalk"my way around my own fochin kitchen. But the attention would be drawn to me, as no sane person would react that way, there "must be a good reason"
"What did he do to deserve that!!" That, is histrionic personality disorder. And she is doing your story.
Stop making false statements about me.
Likewise XXX has numerous false statements at the cassopiae forums recently - and all of them are like the testimony you and he have made in the past. The bulk of which have been proved false.
His statements are analyzed (url below) You should inform XXX , that due to all he as done, most of which is demonic, I'd relish the thought of blackening both of his eyes and kicking him in what residual minicule testitcles he may have left, but a school yard joust with that fairy is not a death threat And I am aware that my dream will never come true, as according to you, he has angina. A simply fight with that nancy might kill him. But I am allowed to indulge the fantasy and vicariously kick his ass here
I have cited the general case on a blog (url well below).
Any new false statements will be added. People who make theatrical statements as you have, now and in the past,` sometimes carry the diagnosis of histrionic personality disorder. Your sexual exhibitionism at soundclick and at PGS, and history of sexual manipulations, indescretions and theatrical statements seem to fit the rubric of personality disorder, as does your global potreyal yourself as "universal victim" - your most successful role, but, it is also the role that gets you most of what you want. I have never known you to play any other. But when your behavior/allegations get this serious, you present a danger to me, as Powers did by perversley defending himself that way when he mispercieved I'd filed suit against him.
The only victims are me, my children, and my family. I consider your passive aggressive allegations. violent,, especially since now, there is evidence XXX is able to emmulate my IP, the evidence is on the computer crimes page. You can now generate emails that appear to come from me and may even have my IP. His allegations and yours are dangerous and a threat to me.
May I remind you Ms XXX, my passport was stamped thanks to you and XXX, I couldn't go to Nova Scotia without a five hour inteview explaining the circumstances where you invited me to scotland, and how you subsequently smeared an immigration officer, for his intuitions about you. Using Alex Salmond and Sandra White to do it.
And what would I have flown into? You Jealous former husband, and you welfare issues.
The fact that XXXX can generate internet activity using my IP presents a problem and a danger to me. Do I need to change my provider and hence my IP, or will you simply discover it, and endanger me again? I am not going to get, a new IP, and knuckle under to you're tyrany. (see computer crimes page url below)
By your own admission, in a round about way, with another agenda, you made false statements about your first husband, and he went to prison. (if he is still alive he should be reinterviewed, as you told me, he did not ever beat you, he pulled you hair and listened to your phone calls, and I asked, specifically of you, "did he ever beat you?" You did not say he did. Jail seems a way you validated yourself as victim to your mother.
and friends after all - the problem could never be YOU.
Stop making false statements about me which endanger me and my family. Otherwise prove your statements catagorically by allowing me to have them forensically analized, be prepared to the allegations under oath
Make that charge in a Peabody Mass court, or to the FBI, put up or shut up.
May I remind you XXX that XXXX's hard drive is under subpoena, this may result in evidence of collusion and serious acts commited against others, possibly criminal in nature, and definitely civil - that hard drive could be of benefit to me, as it may contain evidence of collusion between You XXXX and XXX, and other EOPC fighters in criminal conspiracy (my civil case, nursing) I may testify in that case, if asked, either directly, or by deposition - and I will convey my experience with XXXX, and I will ask inquire about any evidence of a criminal conspiracy that may exist on that drive. evidence of you plotting with XXXX and XXXX, With that I can put your outrageous claims to bed permanently.
In addition. Ms XXX, XXXX has made statements that you were falsely accused of welfare fraud, the evidence suggests you were justly reported. The evidence was very strong. I have invited you to sign a release for this informaion that meets court standard: e.g, a mail to me, with a reference number, that way I can call DWP and verify with a manager, that the investigation has produced no result. If wrong, I will publically apologize.
You have made statements about PTSD, that you were hospitalized for same, in 08. and properly diagnosed. Since you have made these statements in public vis a vie EOPC, please back it up with another simple signed release, which simply says "she was so diagnosed."
Neither of these should pose a problem, and privacy is not an issue, as your story is directly linked to my name, photos address, those are true privacy violations,
You are challenged publically XXXX because I don't go behind he scenes and snipe, what I say, I sign my name to...produce your evidence to me, or learn to stop stalking me, monitoring my statements about your fithly page on facebook, which only serves to further your aggressive attacks against me. The cause and sequence of aggressions is clear enough to me, you have made them obscure by deliberation, and whenever you do hide your identity and smear and attack me and my wife you will be routed out, brought out in the open and challenged.
Could XXXX please produce the famous British Psychologist who said I should be put down like a dog? I have an issue with his idea of treatment, I expect he is from Hanibal lecture school rogue psychology.
And so, I am wondering if recently you have recieved any emails, because, save for today, and cc to brits, I have not emailed you since last August. There were two requests sent to Auntie Audrey to remove her page, she was not threatened. legally or othewise.
Our issue is the movement of your filth to facebook, defending Auntie XXX, by alleging death threats in the past, is not acceptable, Justfiying it with alledged death threats is the way you advance your aggression.
Auntie XXXX was provacative
instigation on soundclick hence it is the same on facebook, Facebook is a family oriented site Not a vendetta sex smear site, You are in violations of TOS, and your multilayered coverings of agony aunt, and promoting of soundclick musicians is just perverse veil of defense YOU arrived with you soundclick smears. and adapted the rest when the page was reported.
30 people have reported it, you're a success, congradulations
But have you rationalized there and at soundclick by use of files from eopc 08 -09. Smears and lies.
Advancing your hostile aggressions using alleged death threats and eopc smears will not be tolerated.
Furthermore, XXXX and you say, Welfare fraud reports have no substance. Really XXXX? The evidence was overwhelming. The existence of an second off shore bank, intellgent finance, used to hide money, was proved from paypal payments. That account existed prior to meeting me. My payements sent to you, would have to be investigated, by way of checking routing to that bank, from LLOYDS your welfare account. If none existed DWP would have to open up pay pal and verify my payments to "a bank." that bank, would be intelligent finance.
They'd check all my numbers, verify you were paid, and to which bank, They would also check all monies that were ever placed there. On that fact alone, the evidence was strong. You should have no bank to hide money. And, as you know, other proofs were supplied to support deception 2003 - 2008, and 2008 ---
But, I have challenged you to produce a signed release that is verifiable by court standards, you demure. You also demure when I challenge you on all statements, but of particular interest is the one where through eopc you say were diagnosed with PTSD in 08, and hospitalized for same, because of me.
Since it was announced in public, and I was cited as the cause, a signed release simply saying you were diagnosed because of me, should be no problem. But it seems to be a persistent problem, going back to your 08 EOPC testimony where the same challenge was demanded. And, that is not very surprising since I suspect none of your statements are true, including your alleged death threats. I might add that, the extent to which you manage to surpress free speech, such as shutting down my talk back at zimbio mindsay and wordpress in 08, may have employed anon defamations to blog support then, those could be under subpoena. for alleged death theats used.
I filed a complaint to the complaintboard.com, on soundclick, In order for that to be removed, a sensational statement would have to be made to shut that down, as the complaint board is not liable for what I say. They denied their own eyes, hard evidence. So, were alleged death threats used there? That evidence would be under subpoena in any civil action against you.
And, when you were using Scott Powers, one prepared to make that allegation against me, I hired Timothy Burchell in Britain. Somehow his report did not jive with any known facts, as he gave me a paltry report, no address for you,
he said your divorce was irreconsilable differences, which was probably false, he said rick kline worked for a company he never worked for, and paid no income tax for 25 years and he tried to justify XXX paying no tax. Did you get to him, if so, how did you know which one I used (refer to computer crimes page, hacked emails)
The report was nonsense. Did XXX Powers or YOU contact him and allege "death threats?" If this is the way you defend you self Miss XXX be forewarned, I will not tolerate this dangerous approach without taking legal action against you and XXXX ne on your home turf or here. All of your testimony from behind the scenes, done in various locations could be under subpoena to see if this is, in fact, you get away with endangering me, or the way you edify your repution, or justify your internet smears and baiting at soundclick, or at facebook.
The general discussion of the new attack at eopc is here:You should note, Sandra Brown is a Psychologist, she does not, and never has, endorsed this group. (THIS IS A BLATANT LIE)
A on offer to XXX, to engage in a school yard fight. XXXX and your friends ms smith can now generate internet activity that appears to me coming from me. If you have recieved emails that appear to come from me, please forward full headers (see url below) Pay particular attention to how he hacked my ID safe.
and opened a twitter account, and broadcast a gay bands news, to my Ilike account, Ms Smith weren't you challenging my orientation in your soundclick "fairy stories?"
Again, XXXX? your evidence needs to presented to me, with full headers, not to continue as you have been , behind my back to others, not as XXXX, but as Victim 1. This is a pattern in 08, you were Kinky XXX, Now you are Auntie XXX, and at cassopiae you allege death threats to an anonymous Purple haze This anomity is conspicuous and prurile, as spreading anon smears far and wide will somehow make them true. What is especially queer is your false image and masked voice at soundclick taking sick pot shots at my family, It is supreme cowardice.
Send the evidence please.
PS: In my civil case, the one you destoyed, the allegation that a manager threatened to pull a nurses eyeballs out if she slept on the job was the issue.
There's another example of people defending themselves with lies.
If you remember, I challenged the admin to summit a police report, and a report to the board of nurses. They didn't do it. No citation against my right to have a nurses license was ever made. And this is because, they could not prove it, and did not want to prove it. The police would investigate and so would the board.
The issue was reverse discrimination involving five black nurses. It was submitted to the MCAD, Suffolk court, and it was pulled after two years of your assualts on it, with allegations like you have made, at EOPC, contaminated from the internet. When an anonmous caller in april of 2010, said I would settle for 10k and eligibilty, the case had to be pulled from the courts. YOU would be deposed. What would you say in your deposition if your two year ambition was to destroy that case?
You won your victory XXX, you labled your poetry at soundclick Poetic Justice, and recorded Fairy Gerry's Judgement day (Fairy Gerry Lapierre, from the french Gerry Stone, I am sure your brother will recognize Scary Mary, I believe those recordings are replete with court scenes. Even Mr Mann of Scottish immigration was in them, as well as the two gloved fairies who had to frisk me before I got on the plane in 07. Mr Mann questioned your motives as much as mine saying "they invite them into scotland to get them off of welfare. I have offered my condolences to him, vis a vie Alex Salmond in 08, for all of the trouble you put Mr Mann through.)
Sincerely,
Gary Stone
XXX when it comes right down to it, you're just an asshole
You are the best example I can think of destructive violence of the Professional Victim
Take your faries and get lost I am going to consult a lawyer on this matter. ___________________
MORE SENT TO US FROM STONE'S VICTIMS -- STONE'S FACEBOOK
Gary StoneNot adding more on this subject on hold for now, good nite 50 minutes ago ·Like · Gary StoneWorld renowned professor of endocrinolgy? 3 hours ago ·Like · Gary Stone or doc haliday from ok coral...they'd all say the same thing, "dont make a mess you can't clean up, and then compensate: 3 hours ago · Like Gary Stone and if you, take responsibilty for it yourself 3 hours ago · Like Write a comment... Gary Stonefind a 3rd party mediator and get out of the spy business 3 hours ago ·Like · Gary Stone XXX take down Auntie XXX and focus on you radio program 3 hours ago ·Like · Gary Stone goofthetoylanderstpi.com This site is designed to showcase the work of unique and talented independent musicians and other artists who self publish. 4 hours ago ·Like · · Share Gary Stone G needed to ve capitalized in the url 4 hours ago · Like Gary Stone There are way too many typos on that page. But those images are going to be important later, I iwll explain them more clearly on an extyernal blog. 4 hours ago · Like Gary Stone take auntie XXX down XXXX4 hours ago · Like Write a comment... Gary StoneI want to get to the absolute bottom of this, and believe me I will 5 hours ago ·Like · Gary Stone Auntie XXXX was about making you bogius case, not look bogus, but if you could create the illusion of legitimacy, you had to play your most famous role ever, Auntie XXXX 4 hours ago · Like Gary Stone Gary would be ranting and raving harassing XXX, and falsely accusing her of being Auntie, and up until Sept you werent indentifiable. Y 4 hours ago · Like Gary Stone But, By sept 2010, it was nailed. Rven butler admitted it, and he will regret saying "well how do you know she's talking abiout you" 4 hours ago · Like Gary Stone You dont put that jerk back to work by putting me in prison 4 hours ago · Like Write a comment... Gary Stone ricky 5 hours ago ·Like · Gary Stone When did you enroll in cyber forensics school 5 hours ago · Like Gary Stone was it after? 5 hours ago · Like Gary Stone was it when bulter got invilved, I have that dated Feb 09? 5 hours ago · Like Gary Stone Jeff was mighty impressed with your hacking skills, but I never understaood why the subject came up March 09 5 hours ago · Like Gary Stone mmm 5 hours ago · Like Gary Stone did you develop a business plan witth the nessie monster, and scot and Jeff to create a Business model? XXXXX super spy? 5 hours ago · Like Gary Stone I think so, you were to be the technical strong pud in Britain 5 hours ago · Like Gary Stone sorrry I meant arm 5 hours ago · Like Gary Stone I was just making small talk, well not small, well you know what I mean short dick 5 hours ago · Like Gary Stone XXXX we cant have crooks in cyber crime enforcement, that is very very bad 5 hours ago · Like Write a comment... Gary Stone XXXX do you rem your Hummbucker post? and 2007 earl post song contest? I cant find Hummbuckers post anywhere 5 hours ago ·Like · Gary Stone Is the chrristas contest 2007 of earls poem still there? I have a photo 5 hours ago · Like Gary Stone haha 5 hours ago · Like Gary Stone haha 5 hours ago · Like Gary Stone Auntie XXX didnt enter that contest, XXXX did, remember? 5 hours ago · Like Gary StoneYep Guardian is gonna find out about how you see me asthritically challenged face popping up Mookie1.com 5 hours ago · Like Gary Stone tracking cookies 5 hours ago · Like Gary Stone not good 5 hours ago · Like Gary Stone I miss those cookies where are they dear? 5 hours ago · Like Gary StoneThe guilty always feel stalked, unfortunately I am my own sherlock, but theres;a nother out there, she's called Guardian 5 hours ago · Like Gary Stone You have made a big mistake XXXX. May 2010 still connected to eopc 5 hours ago · Like Gary Stone 2009 still connected 5 hours ago · Like Gary Stone You tried to put me in prison to make you llook good, and you know that is impossible 5 hours ago · Like Gary Stone Looking good are being good are two different things and when you pull that stunt on me, it is going to be addressed. Theres no way, you can make powers look good either. 5 hours ago · Like Gary Stone This idea, was also not so clever 5 hours ago · Like Write a comment... Gary StoneIs it worse than it appears? 5 hours ago ·Like · Gary Stone Byrd is busy on sc servers erasing evidence 5 hours ago · Like Gary Stone These people dont know whether to shit or go blind ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The FBI is investigating XXX, and I am sure it will lead to XXXand XXXX eventually. XXXX is involved with perverse activity and criminal activity which will get her arrested eventually. When they get her, they get XXX
I am going to deactivate my account for awhile, if they are getting in here, they can shut my account down by forwarding messages that appear to come from me. So, I will come back when they are in prison. The account is not safe now. It will be deactivated in the am.
shared with EVERYONE yet he claims HE is being stalked and hacked?
Women and telephones, if they didn't have phones, they'd go crazy. And, yet, when they get on the phone. They don't talk about anything that makes sense.
BTW - no one is 'in prison' and no one but Stone is being investigated. The FBI/ IC3 isn't looking into anyone he mentions. They have an 8+ year backlog and they are aware of Stone. EOPC does not attack, we report. The Peabody, MASS (USA) police most certainly take all reports seriously and are aware of Stone's cyberharassment and have been for some time; they didn't discount anything any of his victims sent them. This is pure nonsense from Stone that does not appear to have foundation in much reality.
He's back on Facebook - obviously this relentless harasser never gives up!! No one 'hacked' him - Facebook is getting sick of his delusional paranoid raving. EOPC does not drive around with a laptop "wifi sniffing" just so we can spend 20 + hours to successfully hack his bank account! LOL! EOPC does not care. We report and move on.
Stone also states that a bit torrent server is connected and hacked into his machine, he's not very smart. He's probably downloading movies via Torrent files and a Bit-torrent client like VUZE - His daughter might be downloading from her computer. Who knows with a paranoid delusional like this!
"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." ~ Albert Einstein
This site's focus is on Online Predators who prey on Other Adults via chat sites, message boards, dating sites, reunion sites and shared interest or support boards. This includes those who stalk and/ or harass exes via the internet (i.e. web postings, hate sites, blogs, Facebook, etc.).
We do this with the WRITTEN & SIGNED AGREEMENT(S) of those they have preyed on or harassed. We receive the photos and other information FROM these victims. They sign a release and it is legal binding - holding EOPC totally harmless from any lawsuits including Defamation, Libel, False Light or Hate Speech. We make no money and collect no private information other than what our victims give us. We NEVER publish addresses, social insurance numbers, or anything that could be used in Identity Theft. Problems with what we post can ONLY be addressed with the victims. CLICK HERE FOR MORE.
Comments within posts are the OWNERS' PERSONAL OPINIONS ONLY. We are NOT lawyers, law enforcement, doctors, therapists or mental health professionals. This is a volunteer support group for Cyberpath victims. It makes no money.
(DO NOTLEAVE A PERSON'S INFORMATION TO EXPOSE IN OUR COMMENTS AREAS. AND DO NOT JUST SEND IT IN AN EMAIL WITHOUT OUR RELEASE FORM ATTACHED - IT WILL BE DELETED!)
"EOPC" is the pseudonym used to post here by the persons who run & contribute to this site. They also work together to support victims in their recovery.
WARNING TO TO THOSE WE EXPOSE: BE VERY CAREFUL WHAT YOU ARE ACCUSING SOMEONE OR THIS GROUP OF!
TRUTH is a 100% defense to defamation, slander or libel.
Accusing someone of defamation, slander or libel when they are telling the truth or giving an OPINION, however, CAN BE actionable. FALSE LIGHT - speaking in a false manner or 'fudging' facts is also ACTIONABLE..
Remember 'criticisms may be true or statements of opinion and thus may be protected First Amendment speech'. Therefore they may not be subject to identity disclosure. And again, all exposes here have signed statements from the alleged victims stating that EOPC is 'held legally harmless' from any & all lawsuits or actions arising from them.
NOTE: While over 75% of pathological persons have been identified in research as male, 25% of them are female. Because the male gender is used in some of these articles does not mean women are not capable of the same predatory behaviors.
:
All writings, formatting, pictures, links, ideas, opinions and resources from this blog and discussion group are covered under a Creative Commons License and cannot be used without the express permission of the site owners.
Any 'exposure' information about someone posted in any "Comments" area - WILL BE DELETED. Any comments or emails that accuse, put-down, trigger or blame our victims - WILL BE DELETED.
We make efforts to check out the validity of the information we are given, including the truthfulness of those reporting this information. We do not want nor do we collect social insurance/ security numbers, credit card numbers or private information about any individual. Our verification can include evaluation of IMs and emails and even contact with law enforcement when possible and reasonable.
We maintain strict anonymity and privacy for valid victims due to the trauma & PTSD they are experiencing. All writing by the "EOPC" team are the OPINIONS of the team and should not be construed as legal absolutes. They are opinions only.
OUR COPYRIGHT: By sending EOPC anything or agreeing for us to interview you, you're granting us a license to use it in any way we deem fit, whether it be publishing, modifying, storing or reusing in any media form known to humankind, royalty free. We exercise ALL copyright and publicity rights regarding the information, in perpetuity.
If you don't want to grant EOPC these rights, please don't send us anything or agree to anything. We only need the permission of one of the people in a chat to publish a chat. Once something is posted, it stays posted.
Posters must agree hold EOPC totally harmless & take total responsibility for any legal actions arising from the expose we do on your behalf.
EOPC also reserves the right to remove any information off EOPC's main site at our sole discretion. Again, once it's posted, it stays posted.
If you want to use anything from EOPC you must write us to ask permission or we will exercise our legal right to pursue you under copyright infringement laws.
EOPC will post stories, emails & instant message exchanges (with permission & verification) with KNOWN Online Players for educational purposes: to show not only what to expect from the specific persons involved; but from Online Predators in general. Readers can watch their 'psychopathic seduction' unfold & educate themselves to be able to pick up the red flags faster and avoid getting conned, harassed or stalked!
Any "NAME" with the (") marks around it is a pseudonym used to protect innocent families & associates as well as preserve possible ongoing legal investigations.
Want to Expose a Cyberpath?
You must first read our longer exposes (links on right of this site and be familiar with our 'style'). We do not allow flaming.
Support Bloggers' Rights!
