UPDATE

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2013 - POSTING ON THIS BLOG WILL NO LONGER BE 'DAILY'. SWITCHING TO 'OCCASIONAL' POSTING.

Friday, May 20, 2011

More Raving from Stone





from Gary Stone: 


Alledging death threats is a violent act.

At the cassopiae forums XXX, you have made false allegations of stalking and other sensational statments, none of which you prove.

You call yourself Victim 1, and take no responsibilty for what you say.

You also make statements that I have made "death threats." I have not made "any" death threats, if you continue to make such allegations, these statements will be taken to a British court. under the general heading of "defamation," under which the character of these alleged threats -

will be reviewed in light of the hundreds of other false statements you have have made on the internet about me, my wife and children. Made to eopc, and at Ic3.gov..

You are challenged now - to produce proof of these alleged death threats by forewarding to "me" all communications in which you have interpreted the content as a threat to you life. Include full headers, so these can be examined forenscially. Emails generated from any of my known emails or anonymous emails. I do not use anonymous remailer, or any anonymous emails or conduct any anonymous activity. You do, you use Bit torrent and hidemyass.com so does XXX.  (He's blaming a couple of our old support group members here.  His victims published on our site, emails they felt were threatening to them.  We do not use hidemyass.com, we have no reason to.)

Failure to produce this evidence to me is an act of pure cowardice, and it is testimony their character. It implies you simply want to say these things. This will not go unchallenged. Prove it to me.

Proof, does not mean rushing to others and trying to convince them behind my back anonymously as Victim 1 at EOPC,

Convince me Ms XXX, using your full name.

Otherwise, cease and desist from histrionic manipulative smears, the behavior you employ so often to get an emotional rise out of others to get your way. I have made zero death threats, and if I had, the FBI would have made taken issue with me, when you filed your case with them, that case was successfully answered, But your passive aggresssion and the these kinds of threats come from others you know.

Scott Powers made similar allegations in 09 and would not produce the evidence either. Powers alleged the same to my wife, in August 09. It seems false death threats are the way he gets his way (on the other hand XXX, I have recieved veiled threats from XXX, and EOPC and Jdog, which are highly suspect for physical threats. )

Powers had threatened in the past to allege I made death threats against him to ward off a civil suit. He abused my wife in december of 2009, saying that if I didn't remove his name from a civil suit he would call peobody police and make those allegations. A man who would allege charges of that have corporal consequences to me, to avoid civil consequences to himself, is a dangerous man.

He failed to produce these alleged threats to me, or to my lawyer, and lost his license to practice as a process server in Clinton OK, as a result of these and other false allegations. Most of which, you have made. You have damaged his career, by leading mamipulating him with hysteria. (Powers has abused my wife twice on the phone)

XXXX's cease and desist sent to me was dissected in the presence of peobody police as histrionic nonsense. I said to Ms XXX, that she was the type to lie in wait until i go to the market and then start screaming "Mengle Mengle he is a monster!!!" as tho I were a concentration camp anager. I would be there to get bread and milk. This kind of theater does get attention. Luckily she lives in XXX I live in peabody, I am legally blind, and can't "stalk"my way around my own fochin kitchen. But the attention would be drawn to me, as no sane person would react that way, there "must be a good reason"

"What did he do to deserve that!!" That, is histrionic personality disorder. And she is doing your story.

Stop making false statements about me.  (EOPC is a platform for victims.  That is all.)

Likewise XXX has numerous false statements at the cassopiae forums recently - and all of them are like the testimony you and he have made in the past. The bulk of which have been proved false.

His statements are analyzed (url below) You should inform XXX , that due to all he as done, most of which is demonic, I'd relish the thought of blackening both of his eyes and kicking him in what residual minicule testitcles he may have left, but a school yard joust with that fairy is not a death threat And I am aware that my dream will never come true, as according to you, he has angina. A simply fight with that nancy might kill him. But I am allowed to indulge the fantasy and vicariously kick his ass here

I have cited the general case on a blog (url well below).

Any new false statements will be added. People who make theatrical statements as you have, now and in the past,` sometimes carry the diagnosis of histrionic personality disorder. Your sexual exhibitionism at soundclick and at PGS, and history of sexual manipulations, indescretions and theatrical statements seem to fit the rubric of personality disorder, as does your global potreyal yourself as "universal victim" - your most successful role, but, it is also the role that gets you most of what you want. I have never known you to play any other. But when your behavior/allegations get this serious, you present a danger to me, as Powers did by perversley defending himself that way when he mispercieved I'd filed suit against him.


The only victims are me, my children, and my family. I consider your passive aggressive allegations. violent,, especially since now, there is evidence XXX is able to emmulate my IP, the evidence is on the computer crimes page. You can now generate emails that appear to come from me and may even have my IP. His allegations and yours are dangerous and a threat to me.  (Again the point of what EOPC is missed completely)

May I remind you Ms XXX, my passport was stamped thanks to you and XXX, I couldn't go to Nova Scotia without a five hour inteview explaining the circumstances where you invited me to scotland, and how you subsequently smeared an immigration officer, for his intuitions about you. Using Alex Salmond and Sandra White to do it.

And what would I have flown into? You Jealous former husband, and you welfare issues.

The fact that XXXX can generate internet activity using my IP presents a problem and a danger to me. Do I need to change my provider and hence my IP, or will you simply discover it, and endanger me again? I am not going to get, a new IP, and knuckle under to you're tyrany. (see computer crimes page url below)

By your own admission, in a round about way, with another agenda, you made false statements about your first husband, and he went to prison. (if he is still alive he should be reinterviewed, as you told me, he did not ever beat you, he pulled you hair and listened to your phone calls, and I asked, specifically of you, "did he ever beat you?" You did not say he did. Jail seems a way you validated yourself as victim to your mother.

and friends after all - the problem could never be YOU.

Stop making false statements about me which endanger me and my family. Otherwise prove your statements catagorically by allowing me to have them forensically analized, be prepared to the allegations under oath

Make that charge in a Peabody Mass court, or to the FBI, put up or shut up.

May I remind you XXX that XXXX's hard drive is under subpoena, this may result in evidence of collusion and serious acts commited against others, possibly criminal in nature, and definitely civil - that hard drive could be of benefit to me, as it may contain evidence of collusion between You XXXX and XXX, and other EOPC fighters in criminal conspiracy (my civil case, nursing) I may testify in that case, if asked, either directly, or by deposition - and I will convey my experience with XXXX, and I will ask inquire about any evidence of a criminal conspiracy that may exist on that drive. evidence of you plotting with XXXX and XXXX, With that I can put your outrageous claims to bed permanently.

In addition. Ms XXX, XXXX has made statements that you were falsely accused of welfare fraud, the evidence suggests you were justly reported. The evidence was very strong. I have invited you to sign a release for this informaion that meets court standard: e.g, a mail to me, with a reference number, that way I can call DWP and verify with a manager, that the investigation has produced no result. If wrong, I will publically apologize.

You have made statements about PTSD, that you were hospitalized for same, in 08. and properly diagnosed. Since you have made these statements in public vis a vie EOPC, please back it up with another simple signed release, which simply says "she was so diagnosed."

Neither of these should pose a problem, and privacy is not an issue, as your story is directly linked to my name, photos address, those are true privacy violations,

You are challenged publically XXXX because I don't go behind he scenes and snipe, what I say, I sign my name to...produce your evidence to me, or learn to stop stalking me, monitoring my statements about your fithly page on facebook, which only serves to further your aggressive attacks against me. The cause and sequence of aggressions is clear enough to me, you have made them obscure by deliberation, and whenever you do hide your identity and smear and attack me and my wife you will be routed out, brought out in the open and challenged.

Could XXXX please produce the famous British Psychologist who said I should be put down like a dog? I have an issue with his idea of treatment, I expect he is from Hanibal lecture school rogue psychology.

And so, I am wondering if recently you have recieved any emails, because, save for today, and cc to brits, I have not emailed you since last August. There were two requests sent to Auntie Audrey to remove her page, she was not threatened.
legally or othewise.

Our issue is the movement of your filth to facebook, defending Auntie XXX, by alleging death threats in the past, is not acceptable, Justfiying it with alledged death threats is the way you advance your aggression.

Auntie XXXX was provacative

instigation on soundclick hence it is the same on facebook, Facebook is a family oriented site Not a vendetta sex smear site, You are in violations of TOS, and your multilayered coverings of agony aunt, and promoting of soundclick musicians is just perverse veil of defense YOU arrived with you soundclick smears. and adapted the rest when the page was reported.

30 people have reported it, you're a success, congradulations

But have you rationalized there and at soundclick by use of files from eopc 08 -09. Smears and lies.

Advancing your hostile aggressions using alleged death threats and eopc smears will not be tolerated.

Furthermore, XXXX and you say, Welfare fraud reports have no substance. Really XXXX? The evidence was overwhelming. The existence of an second off shore bank, intellgent finance, used to hide money, was proved from paypal payments. That account existed prior to meeting me. My payements sent to you, would have to be investigated, by way of checking routing to that bank, from LLOYDS your welfare account. If none existed DWP would have to open up pay pal and verify my payments to "a bank." that bank, would be intelligent finance.

They'd check all my numbers, verify you were paid, and to which bank, They would also check all monies that were ever placed there. On that fact alone, the evidence was strong. You should have no bank to hide money. And, as you know, other proofs were supplied to support deception 2003 - 2008, and 2008 ---

But, I have challenged you to produce a signed release that is verifiable by court standards, you demure. You also demure when I challenge you on all statements, but of particular interest is the one where through eopc you say were diagnosed with PTSD in 08, and hospitalized for same, because of me.

Since it was announced in public, and I was cited as the cause, a signed release simply saying you were diagnosed because of me, should be no problem. But it seems to be a persistent problem, going back to your 08 EOPC testimony where the same challenge was demanded. And, that is not very surprising since I suspect none of your statements are true, including your alleged death threats. I might add that, the extent to which you manage to surpress free speech, such as shutting down my talk back at zimbio mindsay and wordpress in 08, may have employed anon defamations to blog support then, those could be under subpoena. for alleged death theats used.

I filed a complaint to the complaintboard.com, on soundclick, In order for that to be removed, a sensational statement would have to be made to shut that down, as the complaint board is not liable for what I say. They denied their own eyes, hard evidence. So, were alleged death threats used there? That evidence would be under subpoena in any civil action against you.

And, when you were using Scott Powers, one prepared to make that allegation against me, I hired Timothy Burchell in Britain. Somehow his report did not jive with any known facts, as he gave me a paltry report, no address for you,

he said your divorce was irreconsilable differences, which was probably false, he said rick kline worked for a company he never worked for, and paid no income tax for 25 years and he tried to justify XXX paying no tax. Did you get to him, if so, how did you know which one I used (refer to computer crimes page, hacked emails)

The report was nonsense. Did XXX Powers or YOU contact him and allege "death threats?" If this is the way you defend you self Miss XXX be forewarned, I will not tolerate this dangerous approach without taking legal action against you and XXXX ne on your home turf or here. All of your testimony from behind the scenes, done in various locations could be under subpoena to see if this is, in fact, you get away with endangering me, or the way you edify your repution, or justify your internet smears and baiting at soundclick, or at facebook.

The general discussion of the new attack at eopc is here:You should note, Sandra Brown is a Psychologist, she does not, and never has, endorsed this group. (THIS IS A BLATANT LIE and we have published the truth.)

http://garystonepeabody.blogspot.com

A on offer to XXX, to engage in a school yard fight. XXXX and your friends ms smith can now generate internet activity that appears to me coming from me. If you have recieved emails that appear to come from me, please forward full headers (see url below) Pay particular attention to how he hacked my ID safe.

and opened a twitter account, and broadcast a gay bands news, to my Ilike account, Ms Smith weren't you challenging my orientation in your soundclick "fairy stories?"

Again, XXXX? your evidence needs to presented to me, with full headers, not to continue as you have been , behind my back to others, not as XXXX, but as Victim 1. This is a pattern in 08, you were Kinky XXX, Now you are Auntie XXX, and at cassopiae you allege death threats to an anonymous Purple haze This anomity is conspicuous and prurile, as spreading anon smears far and wide will somehow make them true. What is especially queer is your false image and masked voice at soundclick taking sick pot shots at my family, It is supreme cowardice.

Send the evidence please.

PS: In my civil case, the one you destoyed, the allegation that a manager threatened to pull a nurses eyeballs out if she slept on the job was the issue.

There's another example of people defending themselves with lies.

If you remember, I challenged the admin to summit a police report, and a report to the board of nurses. They didn't do it. No citation against my right to have a nurses license was ever made. And this is because, they could not prove it, and did not want to prove it. The police would investigate and so would the board.

The issue was reverse discrimination involving five black nurses. It was submitted to the MCAD, Suffolk court, and it was pulled after two years of your assualts on it, with allegations like you have made, at EOPC, contaminated from the internet. When an anonmous caller in april of 2010, said I would settle for 10k and eligibilty, the case had to be pulled from the courts. YOU would be deposed. What would you say in your deposition if your two year ambition was to destroy that case?

You won your victory XXX, you labled your poetry at soundclick Poetic Justice, and recorded Fairy Gerry's Judgement day (Fairy Gerry Lapierre, from the french Gerry Stone, I am sure your brother will recognize Scary Mary, I believe those recordings are replete with court scenes. Even Mr Mann of Scottish immigration was in them, as well as the two gloved fairies who had to frisk me before I got on the plane in 07. Mr Mann questioned your motives as much as mine saying "they invite them into scotland to get them off of welfare. I have offered my condolences to him, vis a vie Alex Salmond in 08, for all of the trouble you put Mr Mann through.)

Sincerely,

Gary Stone




XXX when it comes right down to it, you're just an asshole

You are the best example I can think of destructive violence of the Professional Victim

Take your faries and get lost
I am going to consult a lawyer on this matter.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Hacked his accounts? Can anyone who knows anything about computer programming explain what he's talking about?


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Host Name:c-24-91-126-195.hsd1.ma.comcast.net Browser:Firefox 8.0
IP Address:24.91.126.195 Operating System:WinXP
Location:Peabody, Massachusetts, United States Resolution:1280x800
Returning Visits:0 Javascript:Enabled
Visit Length:Multiple visits spread over more than one day ISP:Comcast Cable


Navigation Path

DateTimeWebPage


(No referring link)
11 Dec12:32:06 PM


(No referring link)
11 Dec12:55:13 PM


(No referring link)
11 Dec01:08:50 PM


(No referring link)
11 Dec01:54:03 PM


11 Dec02:21:17 PM


11 Dec02:22:24 PM


11 Dec02:23:18 PM


11 Dec02:24:20 PM


(No referring link)
11 Dec03:07:18 PM


(No referring link)
11 Dec03:21:57 PM


(No referring link)
11 Dec04:24:35 PM


11 Dec05:02:25 PM


(No referring link)
11 Dec05:09:26 PM


(No referring link)
11 Dec06:37:12 PM


(No referring link)
11 Dec07:07:19 PM
11 Dec07:08:05 PM


(No referring link)
11 Dec07:08:21 PM


(No referring link)
12 Dec12:05:58 AM


(No referring link)
12 Dec11:23:05 AM


(No referring link)
12 Dec06:35:29 PM


12 Dec06:37:05 PM


(No referring link)
12 Dec06:38:54 PM
12 Dec06:39:32 PM






Exit Link/Download Archive



10 Dec09:02:14 PMExit Link





No one is 'in prison' and no one is being investigated. The FBI/ IC3 isn't looking into anyone he mentions. They have a 9+ year backlog and they are aware of Stone. EOPC does not attack, we simply report. The Peabody, MASS (USA) police most certainly take all reports seriously and are aware of Stone's cyberharassment and have been for some time; they didn't discount anything any of his victims sent them. This is pure nonsense from Stone that does not appear to have foundation in much reality.

One of our numerous DMCA filings against Stone

No one 'hacked' him. EOPC does not drive around
with a laptop "wifi sniffing" just so we can spend 20 + hours to successfully hack his bank account!  We do not hack down his blogs or hack his email. We don't hack ever.  We are a platform for victims. 



Stone also states that a bit torrent server is connected and hacked into his machine, he's not very smart. He's probably downloading movies via Torrent files and a Bit-torrent client like VUZE - His daughter might be downloading from her computer.

Thursday, May 19, 2011

Facebook = Breeding Ground for Harassment

by Saffron Howden

Cyberbullying a major problem.

POLICE are investigating allegations an Australian mother has been harassed, stalked and bullied on the social networking site, Facebook.

Facebook Stalking Pictures, Images and Photos

The accusations coincide with the release of a new a report into cyberbullying, which found that social networking sites were the most common online vehicle for bullying - ahead of chat rooms and email.

The woman, from just outside Lismore, has become so distressed by the experience, she is considering taking her children and leaving.

She told The Northern Star she was approached in December through Facebook by someone using a pseudonym.

They tried to ingratiate themselves with her by sharing information they knew would interest her.

When she became suspicious, it turned nasty.

The woman blocked the person as a friend on her Facebook profile, but they had already identified all the people listed as her friends on the site and began sending messages to them.
“They said: 'I'm closer than you think' and 'I'm watching you'.

“Quite serious stuff, like everybody hates me and I should kill myself.”

She formally reported the matter to police on Friday.

The experience has been upsetting for her and her young children, she said.

“Facebook is going to be a huge vehicle for bullying and stalking because of the anonymity they've got and they can do this bullying on a massive scale,” she said.

“It needs to be made fairly clear, as far as policing goes, that it's not appropriate behaviour,” she said.


If the perpetrator was positively identified, she said she may be able to take out an apprehended violence order (AVO) against them.

Richmond Crime Commander Inspector Steve Clarke said it was difficult for police to take action in bullying cases, online or otherwise, until the actions constituted criminal behaviour.
“Bullying itself is not an offence,” he said.

“It's something that we're aware of.

“A lot of the service providers would have some sort of system in place that would allow you to change your contact details,” he advised.

NSW Youth Minister Graham West yesterday released a report by the state Youth Advisory Council which found that cyberbullying could be more damaging than face-to-face bullying.

“The fact that the insults, comments or footage can be preserved either by the person who was bullied or others means that the target may read or view them repeatedly, re-inflicting harm with each reading or viewing,” the report said.

It also found that the anonymity of cyberspace may embolden young people to bully where they may not have otherwise.

It recommended the government educate people about the issues and impacts, target existing services to deal with cyberbullying, and work with Internet service providers to create a central body for processing complaints.

hahaha Pictures, Images and Photos

“I don't know what drives bullies to do what they do, or how we can help defeat them but I do know one thing, we MUST do something to stop them and we MUST do it now!!”

“I've had all kinds of things - from text messages and abusive calls (which were private calls and so therefore could not be tracked) all the way to emails, comments, and other such basic bullying tactics … a friend from school … pretending to be me in several instances.”

“Over the course of three years one girl has fueled the cyberbullying against me by writing defamatory blogs about my fiance and me… and by convincing her friends to send not only myself, but my other friend rude comments. There have been threats against me.”
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Predators & Prey Created by Social Networking

Shocked cat Pictures, Images and Photos


By Dan Cole

From creepy stalkers to crime fighters, both sides of crime are using social media to their respective advantage.

Andrea Cowley, a behavioral science major, has repeatedly been on the receiving end of cyber-stalking.

I’m seriously considering getting rid of my Facebook because of some kid,” Cowley said. “I’ve blocked him, ignored him and told him to leave me alone. He just creates new accounts and harasses me from a new profile.”

Social networking sites like Facebook typically give open access to anyone, and let people present themselves any way they want. Others are lured into false senses of security, said Pauline Wiessner, a University of Utah anthropologist. Having to talk to someone online and not in person provides some sense of anonymity.

But Lt. Arnold Lemmon, from the BYU Police Department, warns against this.

“Be as protective of yourself with social media as you would be on the street,” Lemmon said. “I think what we see is that many students come here with a false sense of security because it is BYU.”

Lemmon urged students to take proactive measures with social media to protect themselves. If students find themselves or friends in situations where online crime is being committed, they are urged to report it immediately to authorities.

Social media can also help protect against crime, however, and has become a crime-solving tool in many cases throughout the country. Because social media users provide information about themselves through these sites, investigators use these profiles to track alleged culprits.

Bobby Tarcea was recently a theft victim while attending the University of Washington, and Facebook helped him regain his stolen items. After a party with his roommates and friends, Tarcea awoke to find his laptop missing. From his friends, he found out there was a woman at the party no one seemed to know. After some detective work, he found a picture of the unknown woman taken at the party and posted it on Facebook, asking if anyone knew her. A friend said the alleged culprit looked like someone they went to high school with and sent him the name. With the name, Tarcea found the person’s Facebook page, phone number and work place.

“Got my laptop back after three days of some ‘Law and Order’ detective work,” Tarcea said. “The look on her face when we walked in was priceless.”



original article here

Sunday, May 08, 2011

Rantings of a Lunatic - Gary Stone Never Disappoints



We are publishing these; received from Stone's victims - as examples to our many readers of what these harassers will do and continue to do - even to us. We are unconcerned; Stone doesn't want to get that no one cares. If Stone gets caught doing something dumb, he says he was 'hacked.' Perennial victims like this always need a "boogey-man" and we seem to be it for Stone.
______________________

Gary Stone
My guess is, that if they get xxx's hard drive, XXX would turn on XXXX, on a dime, I am basing that on how she has jumped ugly on Brown.
9 hours ago ·Like ·


Gary Stone XXX has republished a story, that has cost Scott Powers his PI license. (Powers lost his PI license all by himself. We had nothing to do with him)


Powers/Butler solicit Money, saying EOPC has commited Crimes. May 09
by Gary Stone on Wednesday, May 18, 2011 at 4:01am
After the blog wars ended 08 - 09 Jeff Butler and Scot Powers solicited money
to go after eopc. They wanted to exlude XXXX, saying crimes and been commoted
but - it ws eopc who ran away with the story. Later, Power said he filed a case for Smith and Kline
I filed one on all of them. Something was fishy about the offer. Powetrs got very mad, when I said wanted to talk to my lawyer. I didn't send the money. Sending Wastern Union was very suspicious. Usually it was sent via webiste. By CC. It had to be done hat week end. I got the feeling I was being pressured.
and sandbagged. If FBI saw that Powers had a long association wirh EOPC and it seems reasonable, as XXX was referred to Powers by XXX, then Powers planned to use my money
to finance XXX trumped up case against me. I would pay for my own prosecution. There could not be a more derranged plan.

Forwarded conversation
Subject: Re: keyloggers
------------------------

From: jeffrey butler
Date: Wed, May 6, 2009 at 8:52 PM
To: Gary Stone

GARY
lol I told you it would find any thing. Its one of the best programs out there. I use this program. If your accuseing me of hacking I would think twice I follow
DOJ Guide lines for conducting internet investigations. Have at it but I don't do that sort of thing. And your welcome to do it. What the program did is found a keylooger that was previously put on your computer that you may have picked up by downloading a bad program.I use the free version of this program and never had a problem.


JEFFREY BUTLER
TOP FLIGHT INVESTIGATIONS IOWA
DUBUQUE IOWA 52002
563-495-8816
http://www.freewebs.com/uspicybercrimeunit/
http://www.freewebs.com/cybersting/


From: Gary Stone
To:
XXX@comcast.net
Cc: topflightinvest@yahoo.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2009 7:24:00 PM
Subject: keyloggers


Jim, Jeff recommended I download a software called Superspy
and I paid for it, this was when I suspected that my computer was hacked, and with good reason. It picked up a few viruses, but I was concerned about keyloggers.Keyloggers record your key strokes, and so, passwords can be sent to the people who put them on they. I did some research on keyloggers
and downloaded a software to detect them, A keylogger was detected on the very software jeff recommeneded I download.
So, it appears they've bugged my computer. I am going to take this computer to a specialist and have it analyzed. obody is monitoring XXX computer. And so, I am running more tests to check this out, and I will photograph the evidence,
and do a screen shot. I am running more tests and with different softwares and such and photograph each detection, then I think we need contact FBI, to see if they are authorized to do this,
I an uninstalling the software, and running the keylogger program again,. I just opened up an online backing for Gods sake.

----------
From: Gary Stone
Date: Wed, May 6, 2009 at 9:05 PM
To: jeffrey butler , XXXX
I am not accussing you of anything. I am seeing evidence of a keylogger on the computer software you recommended. I download by another piece of software, whether you did it or not is a question not answered yet.
I have to run more tests. I do know this, there was an intrusion attempt from washing dc, that I took a screen shot of, and, I do know that you said the fbI was watching, And I do know that the IP
of klines "email sent to legal authorities" has orginating IP in dc not Dundee.
. What is that about???
The pic of the source signal from dc was sent to XXX. So why dont you clarify with some direct questions: are you authorized by the FBI to monitor me in anyway or are you doing that of your own accord, and is the FBI simply looking at my website, or, have they monitored my router or anything else. I am not looking at XXX activity, or yours, I have a right to know.

----------
From: Gary Stone
Date: Thu, May 7, 2009 at 7:10 AM
To: jeffrey butler , XXXX

Jeff, thx for clearing this up but here's the thing.
A Keylogger was required to steal that last post and here's why.
I saved the url of the defamation post to my favorites folder.
And I edited that post myself on April 4. But, when I clicked that link from my favorites folder, it went to a log on page. But, my password did not work anymore.
That does mean that somebody was using this IP and info from this computer to switch the url from toylandersblog to just Toylanders and also switch the email to another yahoo acct.
So that would leave three suspects, you, XXX, and eopc. I dont believe it was you now. That leaves XXX and EOPC. I also dont believe eopc could post the this on their website, that when I saved their pages on me they said I violated copyright
law by saving those pages, even tho they admit archiving
38 edits of my blog.
the path was C:/mydocuments/gary/desktop/mamoonfiles
they could not know that without spyware.
I downloaded another software, and it turned up spyaxe
a high threat security issue. Also, on the internet one poster
suggested antispyware was a scam. Other articles dont say that.
But, my computer has been illegally hacked by XXX or eopc. or possibly both. I believe doj guidelines are followed by topflight, in short I believe you.
I am going to find out who made those downloads at lulu
and whether smith sent eopc those passwords and whether
they were involved. THat would be theft, also, if there were
additional downloads over 49 after a password change, that would be hackery. And the IP or IPS would say who.
.And after I get that info, I will decide what action to take, if any.
I would urge XXX, that if he is turning these tricks witn eopc for fun, a hard rain is going to fall on him. I will spare no expense to prosecute the lot, and this is no idle threat,
You, in large measure Scott, have been mostly fair on this although Scott has a biased idea of cause and effect on this
Kinky XXX started this mess.
----------
From: Gary Stone
Date: Mon, May 25, 2009 at 12:49 PM
To: jeffrey butler
Jeff, I am republishing the article "when will google answer the phone" without names.
I am doing it for a few reasons
1. It not only identifies a problem, but it poses a solution
2. it accounts for the residual that is still out there,

I think the article makes good points, it will be posted in the commentary section
of www,thetoylanderstpi.com
If EPOC goes uncriticized, they become dangerous. Too powerful, but, this new
version does not name them, it deals with the generic problem.
Regards, Powers should have no issue, but I bet XXXX will report it, he's stalking my website.
Gary

-----
From: jeffrey butler
Date: Mon, May 25, 2009 at 1:22 PM
To: Gary Stone

By all means go a head I have no objection.


From: Gary Stone
To: jeffrey butler
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 11:49:31 AM
Subject: Re: keyloggers



----------
From: Gary Stone
Date: Mon, May 25, 2009 at 1:39 PM
To: jeffrey butler
I will forward the link when I am done editing, maybe later this afternoon. Thx
Gary

----------
From: Gary Stone
Date: Mon, May 25, 2009 at 3:19 PM
To: jeffrey butler
Ok Jeff here it is...bet a nickle XXX makes an issue.
But, this needs to be said. Again, there are no names.
excepy J dog.
Gary

http://thetoylanderstpi.com/The_Toylanders/googlephone.html

----------
From: jeffrey butler
Date: Tue, May 26, 2009 at 9:24 PM
To: Gary Stone

If your interested in putting a case together against the EOPC let me know.


Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 2:19:01 PM
Subject: Re: keyloggers


---------
From: Gary Stone
Date: Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:28 PM
To: jeffrey butler
Can you identify the anon poster, and the person who blocked my deletion? I think fighter one, is sandra brown, but cant prove it. Also, Smith would have to be brought in to such a case.

----------
From: jeffrey butler
Date: Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:02 AM
To: Gary Stone

He is back a it and leave it all up. It is evidence until they are willing to pay and finish this case .I will need to doumnet all of the new postings and video them.I don't want them down.not till they are collected.
http://usa-pi-investigations.webs.com/

Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 4:28:35 PM
Subject: Re: keyloggers


--------
From: jeffrey butler
Date: Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:07 AM
To: Gary Stone

gary
I want you to post what you want as long as it is about eopc trying to keep Scott off your back I sent a email stating it was evidence.
which i sent over to you that is what I sent scott .i willing to help but only against eopc but if it leads to XXX oh will.


From: jeffrey butler
To: Gary Stone
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 9:02:17 AM
Subject: Re: keyloggers



----------
From: Gary Stone
Date: Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:26 AM
To: jeffrey butler
what is he talking about, he is back at it? what XXXX have said, is what eopc accepted without question. Keep off of my case, there is nothing about elaine and rick, but - if they are filing, I may have to prempt them.

----------
From: jeffrey butler
Date: Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:40 AM
To: Gary Stone

I knew XX would object to your postings oh well.

563-495-4119


Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 10:26:07 AM
Subject: Re: keyloggers

----
From: Gary Stone
Date: Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:46 AM
To: jeffrey butler
two things, I did too, he's a weasel looking for trouble, which is why he told XXXX to not document erasure of my financials. Anyway, two things, you said a month ago that I could keep that post if I removed names, and I did.
Its a good article, the fact that I reference a sociopath, or sociopaths, is irrelevant, as it doesnt name anyone.and, I cleared it thru you
----------
From: jeffrey butler
Date: Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:53 AM
To: Gary Stone

We can build a strong case and crimes have been committed but it well take time to put together and you need to be patient.
I would ask you to limit your postings to your site and state only facts and leave names and nick names out. I will need to do stings
and capture evidence as will as collect any evidence you have. The evidence collected then is sent to Mr Powers.Reports are written
and sent to FBI and DOJ. Like to discusss this with you this afternoon may call.


----------
From: Gary Stone
Date: Thu, May 28, 2009 at 12:05 PM
To: jeffrey butler
Jeff, it really doesn't sound like scott is on my side.
Show me who sent the anon posts, the emails sent to me
at word press, in which they threatened a legal case, and impresonated a nurse. This article is the only article of anon defamaers. I would prefer to leave XXXX of of it. however, she made 40 false statements, and sent legal documents, All could have been proved false.

----------
From: Gary Stone
Date: Thu, May 28, 2009 at 12:44 PM
To: jeffrey butler
what is Powers logic for making more threats. Ask him if he wants to go after eopc.
G
----------
From: jeffrey butler
Date: Thu, May 28, 2009 at 1:40 PM
To: Gary Stone

Scott said you have a case against EOPC and you have cooperated and willing to work with you. We have a idea who some of the fighters are but we have to prove it so it is not going to happen overnight. You have a case and anything dealing with XXX you need to take that up with your lawyer. But I would not wait and if interested we would require a $1500.00 retainer. Any monies put into this case are recoverable Thur restitution from criminal cases as will as civil suits.


Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 11:44:30 AM
Subject: Re: keyloggers

----------
From: Gary Stone
Date: Thu, May 28, 2009 at 1:52 PM
To: jeffrey butler
I will pay to file the case, provided scot drops the XXX case, and garentees he will not press on harassment issues. Otherwise, you would be working crossed purposes. XXXX's testimony to them, would be part of any case, and so, they would have to prove that what was said on her behalf was true. They can't do that, but obviously her name would come up. Sure, I would file such a case, but you have to see, that XXX's case is based on vendetta. Can you supoena her welfare fraud records from Iverness job centter plus? If you can, you will have done, what they did not do.
They said I manipulated her medicines, but we did nothing her doctor did not recommend, she lied.
They said, I did not have a single copyrighted work, I have 29, they did not check.
They said I stole XXX copyirighted work, and yet. XXX offered them freely in 2007. Never complained to me directly or indirectly, and ignored my lawyers request
to prempt trouble, before the website was put back up. EOPC ignored all of this.
They said her mother was a victim, yes, she is a victim of XXX, and if XXX cheated welfare, she did it in her mothers house, while XXX lived there. I never met her mother. Its one lie after the next.

----------
From: jeffrey butler
Date: Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:07 PM
To: Gary Stone

The case would be the EOPC but what Else comes out of it will be on XXX.I would seriouly pursue this.

Thursday, May 28, 2009 12:52:40 PM
Subject: Re: keyloggers

---------
From: jeffrey butler
Date: Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:09 PM
To: Gary Stone

Give Scott a call he can explain more. 580-275-9053

----------
From: Gary Stone
Date: Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:10 PM
To: jeffrey butler
send link of where to pay.
----------
From: Gary Stone
Date: Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:34 PM
To: jeffrey butler
I called, no answer, meanwhile, my website is shut down, the whole website, what gives?

----------
From: jeffrey butler
Date: Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:35 PM
To: Gary Stone
Cc: scott powers

Go to USPI cyber crime unit fill out intake form.
onceretainer received I will send you a retainer form
western union send confirmation number to tspowers255@yahoo.com
Scott will call you when recevied
send to scott powers
clintion oklahoma 73601 Zip


Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 1:10:27 PM
Subject: Re: keyloggers


----------
From: jeffrey butler
Date: Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:37 PM
To: Gary Stone

On phone here call Scott


Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 1:34:00 PM
Subject: Re: keyloggers

----------
From: Gary Stone
Date: Thu, May 28, 2009 at 3:23 PM
To: jeffrey butler

ok just spoke to him, will file, and send money tommorow.
I will aggregate all info I have on eopc, and upload it to my server.
and put into a folder.
----------
From: jeffrey butler
Date: Thu, May 28, 2009 at 3:44 PM
To: Gary Stone

Ok
. Scott asked if there was any way you could make payment over the Western union on Internet sit today
he is going to be out of town. That way I can start right away.


Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 2:23:44 PM
Subject: Re: keyloggers

----------
From: jeffrey butler
Date: Thu, May 28, 2009 at 3:48 PM
To: Gary Stone

what sites are down


----------
From: Gary Stone
Date: Thu, May 28, 2009 at 4:23 PM
To: jeffrey butler
How do I know he won't use the money to file against me, he threatened in the am. Also, he said
he spoke to Iverness job centre plus, they said "nothing there' the president could not get that info, cause
its data protected. XXX would have to sign a release. I am suspicious about mixed motives, I suppose he'd have to drop the XXXX issue, and state that he has, otherwise, I am working with somebody who is simeueltaneously working against me, makes me uneasy. If he can convince me he knows this is shite, that claims of harassment where largely manipulated by XXX, b. failure to document erasure of my stuff, a simple security issue c and reactions to the monsterous activity at epoc. I didnt intend to use XXX name, she used my name, city, wifes name, photos, etc, and smeared my whole family. I havent emailed them since I was told not to, and nerver will again. He should know they are creeps, you do dont you? You have to be off of XXX case, and on my case. Other wise its conflict of interest.
G
----------
From: jeffrey butler
Date: Thu, May 28, 2009 at 4:32 PM
To: Gary Stone

We are no longer working the XXX case. There is no longer a conflict of interest.


Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 3:23:39 PM
Subject: Re: keyloggers

----------
From: Gary Stone
Date: Thu, May 28, 2009 at 4:38 PM
To: jeffrey butler
ok I will go online
----------
From: Gary Stone
Date: Thu, May 28, 2009 at 4:41 PM
To: jeffrey butler
send what you know to be valid western union link

----------
From: Gary Stone
Date: Thu, May 28, 2009 at 4:43 PM
To: jeffrey butler
I will send 1800
and you will go to work, I want those bastards busted,
----------
From: jeffrey butler
Date: Thu, May 28, 2009 at 4:48 PM
To: Gary Stone

http://www.westernunion.com/info/homePage.asp?country=CN
http://www.westernunion.com/info/homePage.asp?country=CN


Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 3:43:59 PM
Subject: Re: keyloggers

----------
From: Gary Stone
Date: Thu, May 28, 2009 at 5:21 PM
To: jeffrey butler
Western Union® Money in Minutes Service

U8205 We are unable to process your money transfer at this time. Please visit a Western Union Agent Location.
1: Receiver 2: Services 3: Payment 4: Review 5: Receipt
We are unable to process your transaction.
Date of Money Transfer: 05/28/2009


They wont send, after 30" I must have guess the age ofd my house wrong,


----------
From: Gary Stone
Date: Thu, May 28, 2009 at 5:23 PM
To: jeffrey butler
I will have to do it in the am, sorry, I will look for license tpnight

----------
From: jeffrey butler
Date: Thu, May 28, 2009 at 5:26 PM
To: Gary Stone

ok


Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 4:23:05 PM
Subject: Re: keyloggers


----------
From: Gary Stone
Date: Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:34 PM
To: jeffrey butler
I will look for license, if I cant find it in the am then, I will fill out form.
There's no quick fix on that tonight,
Meanwhile, I was telling scott that what eopc was trying to do, after getting me to guess which nurse
they were impersonating, was to get me so pissed off at that nurse, that I would write on her, so they could email her, they impersonated her, to a/ smear me, my wife and kids, b/ threaten the legal case, c manipulate me into writing on her, the way I had described in the one page I had initially on line, at wordpress, on what elaine did at soundclick, and how unfair sound click was in their response, XXX had the nurses email. They would send the nurse the url, and get her to sue me.
How fn sinister is that. You dont get over stuff like this. And comes from collusion with XXX and XXXX went public first at sound click. That page she had was sinister as hell.


----------
From: Gary Stone
Date: Thu, May 28, 2009 at 8:30 PM
To: jeffrey butler
IThis is XXX denying she knows me, she denies she knows who jdog is, she denies knowing fighter, and doesnt know what dating psychos is, or what eopc is, and yet, she wrote on yidwithlid
at eopc, and jdog identifies her as making that post, by IP and email, this is her denial at facebook.
G

Hi XXXBeXXXtween Barbara XXXX and You

Gary Stone
March 28 at 6:47pm
I have an issue with some of your articles, as you know. I think
you might actually be defaming me, and in violation of fedral laws
by, up until now anyway, doing it anonymously.
Please remove your defamatory articles from MIndsay and EOPC.
Sincerely
Gary Stone

XXXMarch 29 at 12:17am
Report Message
I told you once sir I don't know who the fuck you are!
I don't have accounts on Minsay or EOPC and I don't even know what the latter IS!
My hotmail account was phished 2x in the last 7 months and my computer hacked. My mail & IP were used to post on forums and to sign up for information... I am still trying to straighten this out with MSN, Level 3 and other providers as it's Identity Theft.

I don't know you and I don't like these messages you are sending me.
Advertise
Your Profile Is Naked

No profile is complete without fantastic tattoo images like this. Choose from thousands of images and symbols. It's easy and free.



More Ads



----------
From: jeffrey butler
Date: Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:11 PM
To: Gary Stone

Need jdogs evidence against XXXX. The email and Ip number. I know who jdog is and were he lives
and compaines he owns he is a bad apple.


Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 7:30:28 PM
Subject: Re: keyloggers



----------
From: Gary Stone
Date: Fri, May 29, 2009 at 4:21 AM
To: jeffrey butler
tell me if you got that whole thread
----------
From: Gary Stone
Date: Fri, May 29, 2009 at 5:59 AM
To: jeffrey butler
If scot is serious about appltying federal and civil charges to eopc, the case would be huge.
what do you think?



----------
From: Gary Stone
Date: Fri, May 29, 2009 at 6:04 AM
To: jeffrey butler
another point, they make money online, donations and google ads and books, they say they are
from the dominican republic, and lie about that because they are not - do they pay taxes, could get them for tax evasion too. Could be big, cause each instance of posting defamation, is a separate count, sandra brown, also is a licensed social worker, she has diagnosed online (illegal, licensed or not) her career would be over. If XXX gave them the password to lulu.com
they could have been involved in theft, and hackery.


----------
From: jeffrey butler
Date: Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:14 AM
To: Gary Stone

Got it thanks


Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 3:21:09 AM
Subject: Re: keyloggers


----------
From: jeffrey butler
Date: Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:15 AM
To: Gary Stone

Big time case.



Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 4:59:53 AM
Subject: Re: keyloggers



----------
From: jeffrey butler
Date: Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:14 AM
To: Gary Stone

Will be looked into. Send Scott and I western union tracking number as soon as you have one.
Will be going on a fishing exibition as soon as payment is made. Statrting with XXX.

Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 5:04:46 AM
Subject: Re: keyloggers



----------
From: Gary Stone
Date: Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:25 AM
To: jeffrey butler
I have to speak to Jim first, major concerns. Wont be able to use western because they wont accept a temp license, have to wait for duplicate. Sorry, due diligence first. I am checking licensure, and checking some other stuff, there are negative reviews online. Thats all for now.
G
----------
From: jeffrey butler
Date: Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:43 AM
To: Gary Stone

I understand no problem..The negatives are a former client that broke our contract terms.If you look she retracted her negative statements.
I still speak to her by email on a daily bases.


Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 9:25:22 AM
Subject: Re: keyloggers

----------
From: jeffrey butler
Date: Fri, May 29, 2009 at 6:44 PM
To: Gary Stone

Gary
I'm going to be up front with you.
1.Scott has contacts in the FBI Cyber Crime Unit and DOJ that we go directly threw.
2. People come to us because there local law enforcement turn them down.
3. There is a back log of cases 3 years deep with the FBI. We get around it.
4.You can go threw Jim .But you need some one that is well versed in cyber crime.
and conduct the investigation.We have done a lot of this type of work saving the FBI time .
Thats how we get cases done.
We are your best shot at this. We are quite busy, and we need a yes or no.
Best Regards
JEFF

563-495-4119


----------
From: Gary Stone
Date: Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:02 PM
To: jeffrey butler
The part I dont like is the pressure tactic, see I dont respond to pressure.
I wont be manipulated, Jim is out of the country, I dont know if he will take such a case. I dont know if federal prosecutors will. I dont know shit, I am not saying a./ that I dont have one, I do,
b. I am also not saying you cant handle it - you probably can
x, I am saying I have to talk to jim. I think I will cc jim on this...
I am worried about what I see as pressure, as if the case would go away. I am worried about alternating threats with offers to go after them. I AM

Insanity Pictures, Images and Photos
----------
From: Gary Stone
Date: Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:05 PM
To: jeffrey butler
Why dont you email him. If he agrees, Ill go for it.

----------
From: jeffrey butler
Date: Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:07 PM
To: Gary Stone

I understand let me know when we have many cases and have to block our time. No preasure.
If Jim can't handel it there are cyber crime lawyers in your State.

Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 6:02:23 PM
Subject: Re: keyloggers

----------
From: Gary Stone
Date: Sun, May 31, 2009 at 7:40 AM
To: jeffrey butler
I dont think I am going to go with you guys. Too mercenary. I was threatened in the am over
nothing, one of many. I was told to leave smith/kline out of it, when they are as guilty as eopc, vis a vie anonymous defamation, and theft, harassment, indirect thru eopc, sex harassment, and libel. YOU HEDGED ON THAT


thats another thing, scott said, fed prosecutors would handle the case, Jim would do parts like supoenas,
----------
From: Gary Stone
Date: Sun, May 31, 2009 at 7:52 AM
To: jeffrey butler
Also, you have been working with eopc, since december of 2008.
"legal authorities cant keep up with him" it was you/kline and eopc, who
tracked where I saved their pages.
C'//,mydocuments/desktop/mamoonfiles
"THANKS GUYS"
remember?
G



In principle I think fighter one is diabolical, qnd belongs in jail, sandra brown, and xxx
----------
From: Gary Stone
Date: Sun, May 31, 2009 at 9:09 AM
To: jeffrey butler
lAstly,
when I spoke to scott, he was taping me, I could hear the beeps,
now he must think Im stupid, you are supposed to announce when you
do that. It shows too many crossed purposes, it wasnt my job to tolerate
all of this duplicity. i dont need to function covertly. XX has no civil case, so hes trying to get me in jail. It may backfire on him. As it is, I could sue XXX, and file my own criminal charges, and I may, depending on what I get from lulu.
G
----------
From: Gary Stone
Date: Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 6:27 PM
To:
XXX@peabodypolice.org
Powers did not want me to talk to XXX XXbefore sending him money, I think he;s a crook.


Forwarded conversation
Subject: Re: keyloggers
------------------------

From: jeffrey butler
Date: Wed, May 6, 2009 at 8:52 PM
To: Gary Stone ----------
Date: Wed, May 6, 2009 at 9:05 PM
To: jeffrey butler ,
----------
Date: Thu, May 7, 2009 at 7:10 AM
To: jeffrey butler ,
----------
Date: Mon, May 25, 2009 at 12:49 PM----------
From: jeffrey butler
Date: Mon, May 25, 2009 at 1:22 PM
To: Gary Stone

Date: Mon, May 25, 2009 at 1:39 PM----------
Date: Mon, May 25, 2009 at 3:19 PM----------
From: jeffrey butler
Date: Tue, May 26, 2009 at 9:24 PM
To: Gary Stone

----------
Date: Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:28 PM----------
From: jeffrey butler
Date: Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:02 AM
To: Gary Stone
To see the complete text, please view the original source.
Like · · View Original Post · Share


Write a comment...
Press Enter to post your comment.
Sandra Brown MA, EOPC, Who is the exposer? From Mindsay
by Gary Stone on Wednesday, May 18, 2011 at 12:51am
I have heard from Brown's people, they say it is XXX behind this story
Brown, they say, does not endorse eopc anymore. And, that - she is being attacked
by XXX, so where we criticize Brown below, think XXX or XXX
the person who filed Elaine May SmitXXXX h's case, had his license removed in November
of 2009. Scott Powers
.

Here is a reference page for the main page, a dissection of an old blog, by the Fighters, from EOPC. It can only be seen in context, by reading the main page.



This is a copy of the eopc blogs, from 08. We will go thru each statement as we did before and we will hyperlink to evidence. XXX's story from 08 was proven bullocks
This is the Exposer from the mindsay article. This is the kind of activity Sandra Brown endorses, I don't know if this is Sandra, but, it is one of the fighters. There will be very specific references to each allegation. As there were in 08. I will work on reviewing all of this in the same context as before, using the evidence I used before and reviewing this with the evidence they have now, as well. Think of it as going back in time, to address the Monster who wrote this...one of the Fighters. The word victim is so abused here it will be x'd out in all intances. I will substitute xxxx instead. Eliminating the word victim vs takes something out of the article. Audiences soak this stuff up, and I want to show you how they draw them in, with that words. I will also put ((((( ))))) around hyperbole,and their word play, and choice. Their unreseached statements, in short, I will substitute fact for fiction. You will see how demonic they are. This should be fun for them and the reader. It shows their style...how damaging it is...but I will show you that they had no clue what they were saying statement by statement. ( I will work on this all week) In the interim, read the main blog, as - they have essentially rehashed this nonsense. And what this is really about, is explained there.

Watch this space for how the below, developes. Their statements and mine will be off set by colors. The expose of these pigs will take a long time. It will eventually be a book. And a criminal investigation, that I hope will lead to the removal of Sandra Brown's license to practice in her state, And, the ultimate dissolution of this group called EOPC.



One of the sites that is refered to in this article is this one.



Even the owner of the photo bucket account could be under subpoena (there's a hyperlink to that accoout below. This article, one they wrote at Mindsay in 2008 is a rich source of evidence,and a great way to show you how they play the game, sitting behind their anonymous identity, having no facts, except the lies that XXX Plied them with. They checked none of this story, and weaved this psycho drama, They gradually found out, their Victim was a fraud. So this is an excercise that should prove productive, you can see, how people would eat this up. But it is the kind of tripe that is easily disproved, if you can get a chance to speak. They censor free speech. They went to mindsay support, and blocked my answers and evidence, and had me shut down. This will take some time complete. Perhaps a few weeks to a month. It is taking rough shaoe now.

, but I am very glad I saved this one, and others if only for the links on the pages. As they point to owners of accounts. They're in for a dose of reality And since we are dealing with some real whackos here. In fime you will see their undoing.



Their mindsay story begins here. My statements in blue. (((( )))) is meant to show how, knowing

You started seeing this come out, in 08, and the rats at eopc started jumping ship.

Oh my website, yes, the one that has been shut down by XXX 32 times in one year.
(redacted)
I presume you read the letter to my wife and so you can compare how rude she was to what XX wrote back. I will hyperlink both.
On the XXX Stories. Not exactly "wrote," there was barely a XXXstory that was written entirely by XXX, I think most were me feeding her the plot as in the the Rock Armageddon article, remember step by step we did go through that. XXXX wrote two possibly three by herself. I still write for that character as you know. The rest were co-writen. The orginal concept was conceived together. Think John Cleese and Connie Booth. XXXe is Connie with no character and far less talent.


Hold here for Sandra's little red book, look for key words (((( MIND CONTROL))))) and (((( ROLE PLAYING ))))) does this show up in her BOOKS? Save this for Oprah, maybe she'll buy it. Remember, we are dealing with XXX types, the fighter her cheated on her husband, wrecked her marriage, screwed up her child and blamed it on the cad YIDwithlid. "who the fuck is fighter" XXX. I'd by Powers and Jdog. Her email was in html of the first issue.
(

Gary Stone, through (((( love-bombing )))))and subsequent (((() mind control )))))soon ((((coerced)))) & ((((lured)))) this xxxx into (((cybersex))) (haha, see my comments on that, from my first email to her when she got back, Elaine turned out quite a pro, I was the novice - "interlewds" she called them..."fuck me like you mean it:") via ((role-playing scenarios,)))) which the xxxx initially played along (hahah) with IN FUN ONLY, (fun? with married men, oh yes, there have been lots of them haven't there - 7 at last count --she called her orgasims "hat tricks" .I was holding on for dear life. She had fun alright, we couldn't keep up with her "urgent needs" ) starting with the 'audition in the shower' No it started with "I'll anywhere with you"



I remember the audition, she said she'd like to play my recorder in the shower, in very early January, after I said I recorded there, not in the shower with water running, the acoustics in the bathroom are great) ; followed by ((( romps))))'in the office ', 'on the beach', (there was a beach??? No, no beach) ((('in the court-room))), etc (court room? now that would be interesting. Could you publish all of this end to end please, Im getting excited.) .



(aw poor victim again)

((((Little))))) did the cxxxxm ((((realize___ that Stone's probable (((( psychopathy)))) & magical thinking blurred the line for him between real and imagined events! Hold on, where are you so far in this spectrum? Out left field.


what exactly do mean by blurred reality. Here's a dose of reality, after I got sent back from scotland. Let's look at you Myth of isolation, shall we?Another Sandra ism, I suppose I was delusional and never went to Scotland July 2, 2007, after SHE called my house, and got me kicked out???



By the way, XXX said, she hates it when XXX does this line item analysis. Maybe he had her number. But, he doesn't have mine. I have his, and yours. When XXX got back, everyting had to be about XXX, and of course "she was made to do it" this is XXX delusion. One manufactured for him by XXXX. Rem, she was back in scotland, and she had to justify XXX, the one everyone hated, and she had to "live with XXXX" so some mythology had to e created, one that even he didn't believe.


Yes I know she has a problem with reality and so do you. And you found this out the hard way in 08, didn't you. You said I sent her porn, and it turned out the opposite.


For role playing seeXXXand for that matter Fighter, and eopc, playing super spy.

(redacted)
I have clipped the rest, as we have established a pattern of very definite lies.

Facebook © 2011 · English (US)
About · Advertising · Create a Page · Developers · Careers · Privacy · Terms · Help


Gary Stone
When guys go crazy, the rob banks or something when women go crazy they create tangles that are impossible to untie, soap opera, complications, abd just when you think you have it, it changes shape, with some bizzare new twist. Oprah Jerry Springer, and Nauri , day time TV on LSD
11 hours ago ·Like ·




Gary Stone Between Rick Kline eopc and Jdiog XXX, other fighters there has never been a bigger gathering of fuckwits in i one spot
11 hours ago · Like
Write a comment...

Gary Stone
I think eopc wanted me fo finger brown
12 hours ago ·Like ·
-----------------------


Conspiracy theories abound. Let us just say 2 things:

The PIs mentioned here? Contacted EOPC for money to go after Stone; contacted XXXX (who Stone is CONVINCED is us... lol) for money to go after Stone; Contacted Stone to go after us and others... see how it works? Con men playing high pressure games with vulnerable people...

Also our relationship with Sandra Brown, MA was terminated a few years back.  We learned she is practicing without a license and without proper business filings.  We advise others not to use her services any longer


________________________

Gary Stone iM glad I got that call
12 hours ago · Like
Write a comment...

Gary Stone
XXXX hard drive would reveal every fighter everywhere, and could destrou the whole operation.
13 hours ago ·Like ·




Gary Stone XXX, you are a fool
13 hours ago · Like

Gary Stone eopc was 100 percent n behind dating psychos and probabky 100 person brown, until sone one gets her number Now it is pretty clear what kind of filth has been supporting smith
12 hours ago · Like
Write a comment...

Gary Stone
XXXX
13 hours ago ·Like ·



Gary Stone XXXX, after attacking brown on the external blog, as well as the screen writer
13 hours ago · Like

Gary Stone can see how off they are, when the mask of fighters is ripped off
13 hours ago · Like
Write a comment...

Gary Stone

Gary Stone a quote from email Betsy or Guardian sent me
14 hours ago · Like
Write a comment...
Gary Stone
The person I talked to, says XXX wrote new comments, Mary Mcmahnon I the spelling have made new comments, the story is XXXX per the person who called is a total sociopattj. Onlu ealrl has been sent evidence, that was sent
16 hours ago ·Like ·


Gary Stone They should XXX hard drive, then the gig is up
16 hours ago · Like

Gary Stone XXX wriote most of the 2008 story, why she is messing with me, I have no idea.as she is in deep legal trouble. XXX, if you are watching, I told you know who about your dss issues
16 hours ago · Like

Gary Stone You had to get frisky didn't you XXX?
16 hours ago · Like

Gary Stone has given me 17 diagnosis
16 hours ago · Like

Gary Stone XXX, you are on disabilty not welfare,
16 hours ago · Like

Gary Stone charging people 75.00 for counseling services, you are not qualified
16 hours ago · Like

Gary Stone and you are trying to screw someone who is, Sandra Brown
16 hours ago · Like

Gary Stone How typical
16 hours ago · Like

Gary Stone Whare's Ela Phant XXX
16 hours ago · Like


_____________





(our comments in DARK BLUE)


  • by Gary Stone on Monday, May 16, 2011 at 11:40am
    Notice to Facebook. There have numerous attacks on me by the cyberpath blog.

    There have been numerous attacks on me by XXXX.

    First at the soundclick in 2008 then. Then At the cyberpath blog, where I battled her smears of me for 8 months. XXXs smears and theirs were debunked (really? in his head maybe... lol)
    factually, and with hard evidence.

    XXXX has attacked me again at Soundclick with her "fairy Gerry" recordings and her Auntie XXXX page there, her recordings are subtle smears of me and my wife. She has moved those recordings here. This site is not appropriate for XXXX's personal vendettas. Facebook. (no but Facebook has to endure Stone's 'personal vendettas'.)
    The cyberpath blog has been behind these grotesque attacks (like we have the time or resources...)
    Because she XXX, was criticized by me here for setting up her Auntie XXX page here, and garnering numerous people to support her as friends, she has hyperlinked the Auntie XXX page to Mearns radio, where there are 515 fans and since she updates those pages, she is, ostensibly a fan of her self.

    She has also created an XXXX page, where as her real name, she becomes a fan of Mearns Radio and Auntie XXXX and vice versa, this is very subtle but real instigation and taunting. (so? plenty of business people do that.)

    The cyberpath blog has repuplished XXX 2008 attacks as a result of my criticism of XXX criticisms. The cyberpath blog encourages vendetta, but when they are critcized for their support of it, they try to censure the criticism (This group, is extremely manipulative and dangerous) (LOL!)

    The cyberpath blog has shut down every legitimate criticism of their aggressions and XXX, at zimbio, mindsay, and wordpress. While propagating their smears there. The first cause is always, XXXXX and the EOPC fighters, and what comes next, is my response. (legitimate? lol)
    They were unable to prevent me from defending my self against these attacks only at Bravenet, and Google. (But labeled my Bravenet defense Malware) If I was not able to defend my self at Google and Bravenet, there would still be six pages of negative information in Google. Already, by renewing these attacks for my critique of Auntie XXXX at facebook, based on previously debunked smears, Google is filling up again.

    The cyberpath blog is very skilled with influencing support teams of OSP (who?)'s, usally they use false statements and pathos unsubstantiated pathos.

    Please read about this history from an article on my website called Google Doesn't Answer the Phone, and this article at the hub
    The Malignant Power of Anonymous Defamation.
    Auntie Audrey has been reported numerous times without effect
    The recordings are here:
    https://www.facebook.com/pages/Auntie-XXXX/178103935562101
    XXXXX, has subtley hidden these recordings when she has been criticized
    by first 1/ Adding phony questions and answers and pretense, at being an a comedic agony aunt.
    2/ And by adding a second layer of "cover" by dragging in people she has manipulated at Soundclick to support the perverse recordings there, giving the appearance supporting musicians

    The cyberpath blog will make some attempt to stop what they say is my harassment of XXX, but XXXX was not discussed here, until they and she moved those perverse recording here, wherein , a series of computer attacks occured, and escalated in tandem, to XXX garnering increased support for this perverse page.

    Removal of all criticism of the cyberpath blog or XXXX is contingent on first cause
    1./ removal of the offensive Auntie XXX page at facebook which has had three incarnations, in case one was successfully shut down.
    2/ removal of the cyberpath blog's rehash of XXXXattack on me, which is a response to my criticism of XXXX's Auntie XXXXX page.
    3./ Removal of the fairy XXXX series and "album" at soundclick.

    I will not have the cyberpath blog, or
    Sandra Brown MA, endorsing the cyberpath blog while they smeared me, and she perhaps participated in those smears circa October 2008 - April 2009, at which time all blogs on this subject were ordered down by Scott Powers PI. (ordered? Powers never ordered us to do anything; and he had no authority to order anything) And then tolerate her complaining when she is criticized for the current smears and past smears, at the cyberpath blog.

    The relevant pages (relevant to who?)
    are these: http://hubpages.com/hub/defamationdangers

    criticisms of the model of anonymous defamation in general and a general description of the cyberpath blog's smears, here:
    http://thetoylanderstpi.com/The_Toylanders/googlephone.html

    (their history above)
    The current pages that have been republished by EOPC, as a result of my criticism of the Auntie Audrey instigation's,
    has resulted in a serious critique of this group, and Sandra Brown's endorsement of Exposure sites, that critique is located here:
    http://cybercrimerickkineelainemaysmith.blogspot.com/

    The cyberpath blog, and Sandra Brown, will have official sounding people like Jeffery Butler, or Scott Powers back them up, and they will usually say the most outrageous and false things behind the scenes, in order to censure. But the fact is, that the fighters of the cyberpath blog, and XXXX, and XXXX, have been stalking me, everywhere I go, (No. Sorry.)
    If there is an attempt to contact facebook. I am suggesting facebook communicate with me, before "reacting" to "any official sounding language. The reality is that all of these people have been reported to FBI , Ic3.gov and the report was filed after a "false witness" filing was submitted by Scott Powers. His filing was succesfully defeated. The reality is always more complicated than they allow OSP's to believe. If facebook is contacted, please communicate any statements that have been made. I have no objection to removing all content about XXX, provided all content I find offensive, is also removed.

    I would suggest facebook take a seruous look behind the veneer of Auntie XXX, XXXX And the cyberpath blog.

    all are victimizers, who play victim, (projection) but this role is getting too much miliage, what the cyberpath blog wants - ultimately - is internet dominance. (huh? ROFL!!!) Please consult with me before taking any action on any complaint. These people never tell the truth. This is a serious study, the mother of a small child, with a stress ilnness, unsubstantiated FBI assessments, alledged death threats, (law enforcement is in possession of the death threats) stalking, harassment, cyberpath, these words will be used to cause false alarm, but the truth is much more complicated, and they have not told it yet. I have children too and they have smeared them, I have have been diagnosed with post truamtic sydrome and have been hospitalized and I can prove it. They make these statements about Smith, and never offer proof, Sandra Brown will cite her patients, and lost credibilty, but on study of my critique of her, we will see how she, by her endorsement, and XXXX, have helped destroy my career, And, have attacked everything else I do, on the internet, music art writing

    Please communicate any concerns to me. My interest is in having Sandra Browns licensing board examine her Exposure site endorsement, and her ethics. And, also to provde a closer look, at these Watchers, as serious thoughtful study will show, that they exist in violation of the federal communications act, and have commited numerous crimes (no. sorry again. we don't.) ...they have also involved Ally Byrd (who?) and soundclick support, in this attack. The presence of Auntie XXX on facebook, is the tail end, of 2.5 years of cybercrime. The federal communications act, makes it a felony, to smear anonymously, or threaten or taunt. or insult. The reason it does, is - there is no remedy to stop it, and civil consequences are blocked, by anonmity. The punishment for this "felony" is 18 months in prison, and or/fines. for each instance. Even anon complaints, are "instances"

    Thank You/...
    Respectfully,

    Gary Stone



    ________________

    (excerpts)
    Self-Victimization - "Playing The Victim"

    Definition:

    Self-Victimization - Self-Victimization, or "playing the victim" is the act of casting oneself as a victim in order to control others by soliciting a sympathetic response from them or diverting their attention away from abusive behavior.

    Description:
    Most of us, if we are honest will admit that when we describe events or share stories, we will try to portray ourselves in the most favorable light possible. Playing the Victim is something even small children learn to do from an early age, crying crocodile tears, showing a petted lip or sulking when we don't get exactly what we want, when we want it.


    As we mature as adults, most of us learn to take responsibility for our own situations and our own mistakes and we learn not to blame others for things which are not their fault. We begin to learn that most people can see through insincere attempts at manipulating their emotions.

    Some people with personality disorders, however, do not learn how to mature beyond this stage and continue exaggerated, even blatantly dishonest campaigns to arouse the sympathies of others, even sometimes when their charade appears ridiculous or blatantly disingenuous to observers around them. Sometimes, these campaigns continue to get them what they want, as exasperated family members with weak boundaries try to appease them or just give them what they want in the hope that they will just give it a rest. This is similar to spoiled children, who learn to get what they want from parents with poor boundaries by throwing tantrums, whining, nagging or making ultimatums and threats.

    Sometimes playing the victim is used to divert attention away from a person's own abusive or dysfunctional behavior. If people's attention can stay focused on another individual then the abuser hopes that attention will not rest on their own flaws.

    The goal of Self-Victimization is to control the responses of other people in one of two ways:

  • Divert attention away from acts of abuse by claiming that the abuse was
    justified based on another person's bad behavior (typically the victim)

  • Solicit sympathy from others in order to gain their assistance in supporting
    or enabling the abuse of a victim - also known as proxy recruitment.


    It is very common for perpetrators of abuse to engage in self-victimization. This serves two purposes:

    Justification to themselves - as a way of dealing with the cognitive dissonance that results from inconsistencies between the way they treat others and what they believe about themselves.

  • Justification to others - as a way of escaping harsh judgment or condemnation they may fear from people whom they wish to please or impress.

  • Examples of Playing The Victim:

  • A spouse who is having an affair, claims the other partner drove them to it.

  • A narcissistic boss mistreats a subordinate and claims the subordinate's behavior was hurting the company and he had to do it.

  • What it Feels Like:

    If you are in a relationship with someone who plays the victim, it is easy to feel like you are in the classic "damned if you do and damned if you don't" scenario. No matter how much you try, how well you behave, or how much you sacrifice, your actions and efforts can never fill the bottomless pit of "need" that is presented to you - and to others about you. Once you solve problem "A", problem "B" suddenly appears.

    This happens is because the true "need" is inside the mind of the person who is playing the victim. What they really need is to address their own illness with treatment programs that work. That requires effort and rigorous work on their own part. It has nothing to do with you. Even if you had the character of Gandhi, Mother Theresa and Saint Francis rolled into one, you could never fill the void - because it is a problem inside another person.
    At some point, you are likely to feel resentment and frustration as you realize that your efforts are being consumed and not reciprocated. Worse still, you may find you are the focus of the personality-disordered individual's resentments and complaints.

  • What NOT to do:

  • Don't try to justify yourself or your actions to a person who is casting themselves as the victim. It's their illusion and they are entitled to believe whatever they want in it.

  • Don't admit to or apologize for anything that you haven't done wrong. Stick to the truth.

  • Don't try to compensate for a self-victimizer's complaints by increasing your own effort. Spend your energy on what works.

  • Don't retaliate or strike back at someone who cast themselves as a victim. You are just pouring fuel on their fire.

  • Don't assume that everyone who hears a self-victimizer's complaints believes it. Most people can smell a rat when a story doesn't ring true.

  • What TO do:

  • Try to be as unemotional as possible. Try to judge on facts, not feelings.

  • Keep doing what you know is right - regardless of what a self-victimizer tells you.http://www.outofthefog.net/CommonBehaviors/SelfVictimization.html